Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11181-y.
Despite word-of-mouth (WOM) and electronic WOM (eWOM) influencing people's willingness to donate blood, no research has explored this behavior among blood service employees who are also donors. This underexplored segment is highly important, as they are generally committed to both the organization and the cause and are likely more informed on the topic of blood donation than the average donor.
This study comprised six online focus groups with 26 Australian Red Cross Lifeblood employees who are also donors. Questions covered a range of blood donation and WOM topics, including when they became blood donors, if they had engaged in WOM about blood donation, what they had talked about and with whom, and what were audience reactions. Thematic analysis was then used to explore how responses related to the employees' motivations, opportunities, and abilities to engage in WOM and eWOM about blood donation.
While most employee-donors saw alignment in their employee and donor roles, advocating for blood donation was not considered a necessary part of either role. Educating others about blood donation was a common goal of employee-donor WOM and eWOM, and almost all employees engaged in reactive WOM, triggered by events (e.g., recent donations) or questions about their work. Employee-donors in donor-facing roles (e.g., communications and collections staff) felt more aware of the importance of encouraging others to donate blood and were also more likely to be proactive in their WOM activity. Along with these perceived advantages of having a dual role, employee-donors also identified some disadvantages, such as unrealistic expertise expectations and negative audience responses that can be difficult to navigate.
Being an employee-donor is a double-edged sword. For example, increased opportunities to talk about blood donation and access to more information can be offset by having to respond to more challenging questions/comments and expectations, while appropriately representing their employer. More research is needed among those in employee-donor roles within the healthcare and/or non-profit sectors, to determine whether these are issues faced more broadly, and how those in dual roles can be most effectively supported to engage in positive WOM and eWOM.
尽管口碑(WOM)和电子口碑(eWOM)影响人们献血的意愿,但没有研究探讨过在既是献血者又是血液服务机构员工的人群中这种行为。这个尚未充分探索的群体非常重要,因为他们通常对组织和事业都有承诺,并且可能比普通献血者更了解献血话题。
本研究包括六组澳大利亚红十字会生命血员工的在线焦点小组,这些员工既是献血者也是献血者。问题涵盖了献血和口碑的一系列话题,包括他们何时成为献血者,是否参与过关于献血的口碑传播,谈论了什么,与谁谈论以及受众的反应如何。然后使用主题分析来探讨这些回应如何与员工参与关于献血的口碑和电子口碑的动机、机会和能力相关。
尽管大多数员工献血者认为自己的员工和献血者角色是一致的,但他们认为倡导献血不是这两个角色的必要组成部分。教育他人了解献血是员工献血者口碑和电子口碑的共同目标,几乎所有员工都参与了反应性口碑,这种口碑是由事件(例如最近的献血)或关于他们工作的问题引发的。在面向献血者的角色(例如沟通和采集工作人员)中担任员工献血者的人,更意识到鼓励他人献血的重要性,并且也更有可能主动参与他们的口碑活动。除了这种双重角色带来的优势之外,员工献血者还指出了一些劣势,例如不切实际的专业知识期望以及难以应对的负面受众反应。
作为一名员工献血者是一把双刃剑。例如,谈论献血的机会增加和获取更多信息的机会可以被应对更具挑战性的问题/评论和期望所抵消,同时适当地代表他们的雇主。需要在医疗保健和/或非营利部门的员工献血者中进行更多研究,以确定这些问题是否更广泛地存在,以及如何最有效地支持那些具有双重角色的人进行积极的口碑和电子口碑传播。