Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Department of Medical Sciences, Scientific Institute "Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza", San Giovanni Rotondo, FG, Italy.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024 Jul;213:111743. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111743. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
An initiative of continuous monitoring of the quality of diabetes care, promoted by the Association of Medical Diabetologists, is in place in Italy since 2006 (AMD Annals). The initiative was effective in improving quality of care indicators, assessed periodically through standardized measures. Here, we show the 2023 AMD Annals data on type 2 (T2D) and type 1 (T1D) diabetes.
A network of over 1/3 of diabetes centers in Italy periodically extracts anonymous data from electronic medical records, using a standardized software. Process, treatment and outcome indicators, and a validated score of overall care, the Q-score, were evaluated.
296 centers provided data on 573,164 T2D (mean age 69.7 ± 11.2 years) and 42,611 T1D subjects (mean age 48.6 ± 16.9 years). A HbA1c value ≤ 7.0 % was documented in 56.3 % of patients with T2D and 35.9 % of those with T1D. Only 6.6 % of T2D patients and 3.5 % of those with T1D reached the composite outcome of HbA1c ≤ 7.0 % + LDL-C < 70 mg/dl + BP < 130/80 mmHg. Notably, only 2.8 % and 3.2 % of T2D and T1D patients, respectively, showed a Q score < 15, which correlates with an 80 % higher risk of incident CVD events compared to scores > 25.
We documented an overall good quality of care in both T1D and T2D subjects. However, the failure to achieve the targets of the main risk factors, especially if combined, in a still too large proportion of patients testify the difficulty to apply the more and more stringent indications recommended by guidelines in the everyday clinical practice.
自 2006 年以来,意大利的医学糖尿病学会一直在推行一项糖尿病护理质量的持续监测计划(AMD 年报)。该计划通过定期使用标准化措施来评估质量指标,提高了护理质量。在此,我们展示了 2023 年 AMD 年报中关于 2 型糖尿病(T2D)和 1 型糖尿病(T1D)的数据。
意大利超过三分之一的糖尿病中心网络定期使用标准化软件从电子病历中提取匿名数据。使用过程、治疗和结果指标以及经过验证的整体护理评分(Q 评分)来评估数据。
296 个中心提供了 573164 名 T2D 患者(平均年龄 69.7±11.2 岁)和 42611 名 T1D 患者的数据(平均年龄 48.6±16.9 岁)。56.3%的 T2D 患者和 35.9%的 T1D 患者的糖化血红蛋白值≤7.0%。只有 6.6%的 T2D 患者和 3.5%的 T1D 患者达到了糖化血红蛋白值≤7.0%+低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)<70mg/dl+血压(BP)<130/80mmHg 的复合终点。值得注意的是,只有 2.8%的 T2D 患者和 3.2%的 T1D 患者的 Q 评分<15,这与 Q 评分>25 的患者相比,发生心血管疾病(CVD)事件的风险增加了 80%。
我们记录了 T1D 和 T2D 患者的整体护理质量较好。然而,大多数患者仍然未能达到主要危险因素的目标,尤其是当这些因素同时存在时,这表明在日常临床实践中难以应用指南推荐的越来越严格的治疗指征。