• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常见的秃鹫中抗凝杀鼠剂的暴露:新的杀鼠剂使用规则的影响。

Anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in common buzzards: Impact of new rules for rodenticide use.

机构信息

Wildlife Management Unit, Diagnostics, Wildlife Management and Molecular Biology, SASA, Edinburgh, UK.

Chemistry Dept, SASA, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2024 Sep 20;944:173832. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173832. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173832
PMID:38879042
Abstract

Rodenticides are a key component of rodent management strategies, but birds of prey are susceptible to non-target exposure. New rules on sale and use of rodenticide products were introduced across the UK in 2016 in an industry-led stewardship scheme, with the aim of reducing this risk. To determine if this intervention has achieved its aim, exposure to second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) was measured in buzzards. Liver samples from 790 buzzards collected between 2005 and 2022 (excluding 2016 and 2017 samples) were analyzed and the percentage presence and concentrations of SGARs from pre-stewardship and post-stewardship samples were compared. There was no statistically significant decrease in the percentage of buzzards exposed to bromadiolone, difenacoum or combined SGAR residues after the introduction of stewardship. The percentage of buzzards exposed to brodifacoum increased significantly post-stewardship, from 8 % to 27 %. There were no significant decreases in the concentrations of individual SGARs post-stewardship but concentration of combined SGARs increased significantly post-stewardship. Individual buzzards were significantly more likely to be exposed to multiple SGARs post-stewardship. Rodenticide poisoning was recorded as the cause of death for 5 % of pre- and post-stewardship buzzards with detectable levels of SGARs, and 90 % of these had combined SGAR residues >0.1 mg/kg. These findings suggest that the industry-led stewardship scheme has not yet had the intended impact of reducing SGAR exposure in non-target wildlife. The study highlights a substantial increase in exposure of buzzards to brodifacoum and to multiple SGARs post-stewardship, indicating that further changes to the stewardship scheme may be necessary.

摘要

杀鼠剂是鼠类管理策略的重要组成部分,但猛禽易受到非靶标暴露的影响。2016 年,在行业主导的管理计划下,英国出台了新的杀鼠剂销售和使用规定,旨在降低这种风险。为了确定这一干预措施是否达到了目的,本研究检测了苍鹰体内的第二代抗凝血杀鼠剂(SGARs)暴露情况。分析了 2005 年至 2022 年间(不包括 2016 年和 2017 年的样本)收集的 790 只苍鹰的肝脏样本,并比较了管理前和管理后样本中 SGAR 的存在比例和浓度。在引入管理措施后,苍鹰暴露于溴敌隆、杀鼠醚或联合 SGAR 残留的比例没有统计学上的显著下降。管理后,苍鹰暴露于溴鼠灵的比例显著增加,从 8%增加到 27%。管理后,单个 SGAR 的浓度没有显著下降,但联合 SGAR 的浓度显著增加。管理后,单个苍鹰更有可能接触多种 SGAR。在有 SGAR 可检测水平的管理前和管理后的苍鹰中,有 5%的苍鹰因鼠药中毒而死亡,其中 90%的苍鹰有联合 SGAR 残留>0.1mg/kg。这些发现表明,行业主导的管理计划尚未对减少非靶标野生动物中的 SGAR 暴露产生预期影响。本研究突出表明,管理后苍鹰接触溴鼠灵和多种 SGAR 的情况显著增加,表明管理计划可能需要进一步修改。

相似文献

1
Anticoagulant rodenticide exposure in common buzzards: Impact of new rules for rodenticide use.常见的秃鹫中抗凝杀鼠剂的暴露:新的杀鼠剂使用规则的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Sep 20;944:173832. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173832. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Long-term increase in secondary exposure to anticoagulant rodenticides in European polecats Mustela putorius in Great Britain.英国欧洲雪貂(Mustela putorius)中抗凝血灭鼠剂的二次暴露长期增加。
Environ Pollut. 2018 May;236:689-698. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.004.
3
Anticoagulant rodenticide exposure and toxicosis in four species of birds of prey in Massachusetts, USA, 2012-2016, in relation to use of rodenticides by pest management professionals.2012 - 2016年美国马萨诸塞州四种猛禽的抗凝血灭鼠剂暴露与中毒情况,与害虫防治专业人员使用灭鼠剂的关系
Ecotoxicology. 2017 Oct;26(8):1041-1050. doi: 10.1007/s10646-017-1832-1. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
4
Intraspecific and geographical variation in rodenticide exposure among common kestrels in Tenerife (Canary Islands).特内里费岛(加那利群岛)普通红隼体内暴露于杀鼠剂的种内和地理变异。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 1;910:168551. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168551. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
5
Use of anticoagulant rodenticides by pest management professionals in Massachusetts, USA.美国马萨诸塞州害虫防治专业人员对抗凝血灭鼠剂的使用情况。
Ecotoxicology. 2017 Jan;26(1):90-96. doi: 10.1007/s10646-016-1744-5. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
6
The missing toxic link: Exposure of non-target native marsupials to second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) suggest a potential route of transfer into apex predators.缺失的毒性环节:非目标本土有袋动物接触第二代抗凝血灭鼠剂(SGARs)表明存在一条潜在的转移至顶级捕食者的途径。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jul 10;933:173191. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.173191. Epub 2024 May 11.
7
Second-generation anticoagulant rodenticides in the blood of obligate and facultative European avian scavengers.血液中必需和兼性欧洲食腐鸟类的第二代抗凝杀鼠剂。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Dec 15;315:120385. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120385. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
8
Second generation anticoagulant rodenticides in predatory birds: Probabilistic characterisation of toxic liver concentrations and implications for predatory bird populations in Canada.第二代抗凝杀鼠剂在猛禽中的分布:毒理肝浓度的概率特征及其对加拿大猛禽种群的影响。
Environ Int. 2011 Jul;37(5):914-20. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2011.03.010. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
9
Long-term trends of second generation anticoagulant rodenticides (SGARs) show widespread contamination of a bird-eating predator, the Eurasian Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) in Britain.第二代抗凝杀鼠剂(SGARs)的长期趋势表明,在英国,一种食鸟猛禽——欧亚红隼(Accipiter nisus)受到了广泛的污染。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Dec 1;314:120269. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120269. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
10
Silent killers? The widespread exposure of predatory nocturnal birds to anticoagulant rodenticides.无声杀手?捕食性夜间鸟类广泛接触抗凝血灭鼠剂。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 15;904:166293. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166293. Epub 2023 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Widespread Contamination by Anticoagulant Rodenticides in Insectivorous Wildlife from the Canary Islands: Exploring Alternative Routes of Exposure.加那利群岛食虫野生动物中抗凝血灭鼠剂的广泛污染:探索其他暴露途径
Toxics. 2025 Jun 15;13(6):505. doi: 10.3390/toxics13060505.