Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Room 7E546, 9609 Medical Center Drive MSC 9778, Bethesda, MD, 20892-9778, USA.
Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Headington Campus, Oxford, OX3 0BP, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 15;24(1):1601. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18701-9.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. It has been known for some considerable time that radiation is associated with excess risk of CVD. A recent systematic review of radiation and CVD highlighted substantial inter-study heterogeneity in effect, possibly a result of confounding or modifications of radiation effect by non-radiation factors, in particular by the major lifestyle/environmental/medical risk factors and latent period.
We assessed effects of confounding by lifestyle/environmental/medical risk factors on radiation-associated CVD and investigated evidence for modifying effects of these variables on CVD radiation dose-response, using data assembled for a recent systematic review.
There are 43 epidemiologic studies which are informative on effects of adjustment for confounding or risk modifying factors on radiation-associated CVD. Of these 22 were studies of groups exposed to substantial doses of medical radiation for therapy or diagnosis. The remaining 21 studies were of groups exposed at much lower levels of dose and/or dose rate. Only four studies suggest substantial effects of adjustment for lifestyle/environmental/medical risk factors on radiation risk of CVD; however, there were also substantial uncertainties in the estimates in all of these studies. There are fewer suggestions of effects that modify the radiation dose response; only two studies, both at lower levels of dose, report the most serious level of modifying effect.
There are still large uncertainties about confounding factors or lifestyle/environmental/medical variables that may influence radiation-associated CVD, although indications are that there are not many studies in which there are substantial confounding effects of these risk factors.
心血管疾病(CVD)是全球范围内的主要致死原因。有相当一段时间以来,人们已经知道辐射与 CVD 风险增加有关。最近对辐射和 CVD 的系统评价强调了效应的研究间存在实质性的异质性,这可能是由于混杂因素或非辐射因素对辐射效应的改变,特别是主要的生活方式/环境/医疗风险因素和潜伏期的影响。
我们评估了生活方式/环境/医疗风险因素对辐射相关 CVD 的混杂作用,并利用最近系统评价中汇集的数据,调查了这些变量对 CVD 辐射剂量反应的修饰作用的证据。
有 43 项流行病学研究提供了有关调整混杂因素或风险修饰因素对辐射相关 CVD 影响的信息。其中 22 项是研究因治疗或诊断而暴露于大量医疗辐射的群体的研究。其余 21 项研究是对暴露于低得多剂量和/或剂量率的群体进行的研究。只有四项研究表明,对生活方式/环境/医疗风险因素进行调整对 CVD 辐射风险有实质性影响;然而,这些研究中的估计也存在很大的不确定性。几乎没有证据表明这些变量会影响辐射剂量反应;只有两项研究,均在低剂量水平下,报告了最严重的修饰效应。
对于可能影响辐射相关 CVD 的混杂因素或生活方式/环境/医疗变量,仍然存在很大的不确定性,尽管有迹象表明,这些风险因素的实质性混杂效应的研究并不多。