Rhodes Sinead, Booth Josephine N, McDougal Emily, Oldridge Jessica, Rivera-Lares Karim, Revueltas Roux Alexia, Stewart Tracy M
Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Moray House School of Education and Sport, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06392-5.
We examined whether cognitive profiles or diagnostic outcomes are better predictors of literacy performance for children being considered for an ADHD diagnosis. Fifty-five drug naïve children (M = 103.13 months, SD = 18.65; 29.09% girls) were recruited from an ADHD clinical referral waiting list. Children underwent assessment of IQ, Executive Functions (EF) and literacy attainment. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to generate subgroups of children using EF scores. Data were then grouped based on presence of a clinical ADHD diagnosis and the results compared. Grouping participants by profiles of cognitive test scores led to groups which also differed on literacy scores. However, categorising by whether children had received an ADHD diagnosis or not did not differentiate either cognitive tests scores or literacy scores. Cognitive performance, rather than children's diagnostic outcomes, is more informative for identifying groups who differ in their literacy attainment which has important implications for remedial support.
我们研究了认知特征或诊断结果是否能更好地预测那些正在考虑进行注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)诊断的儿童的读写能力表现。从ADHD临床转诊等候名单中招募了55名未服用药物的儿童(平均年龄M = 103.13个月,标准差SD = 18.65;女孩占29.09%)。这些儿童接受了智商、执行功能(EF)和读写能力的评估。使用分层聚类分析,根据EF分数将儿童分为不同亚组。然后根据是否存在临床ADHD诊断对数据进行分组,并比较结果。根据认知测试分数概况对参与者进行分组,得到的组在读写分数上也存在差异。然而,根据儿童是否被诊断为ADHD进行分类,无论是认知测试分数还是读写分数都没有差异。认知表现而非儿童的诊断结果,对于识别在读写能力上存在差异的群体更具参考价值,这对补救支持具有重要意义。