Hughes Melanie M, Paxton Pamela, Krook Mona Lena
Department of Sociology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
Department of Sociology, University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712.
Annu Rev Sociol. 2017;43(1):331-352. doi: 10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053324. Epub 2017 May 19.
The global proliferation of quotas for women over the past 30 years is both remarkable and consequential. Targeting decision-making positions historically resistant to women's equal inclusion, the adoption of electoral and corporate board quotas has at times been controversial. After adoption, quotas have influenced women's numbers, the performance and outcomes of decision-making bodies, and broader public attitudes. In this review, we distinguish among types of electoral and corporate quotas, trace arguments for and against the adoption of quotas, and review research on factors that influence quota adoption across time and space. After outlining the methodological difficulties in demonstrating an impact of gender quotas, we review research that is able to isolate an impact of quotas in politics and business. We conclude by providing several suggestions to ensure that future research continues to advance our understanding of the form, spread, and impact of gender quotas.
在过去30年里,女性配额在全球范围内的扩散既引人注目又意义重大。选举和企业董事会配额针对的是历来抵制女性平等参与的决策职位,其采用有时颇具争议。采用配额后,配额影响了女性人数、决策机构的表现和成果,以及更广泛的公众态度。在本综述中,我们区分了选举和企业配额的类型,追溯了支持和反对采用配额的论点,并回顾了关于影响不同时间和空间配额采用因素的研究。在概述了证明性别配额影响的方法学困难之后,我们回顾了能够分离出配额在政治和商业领域影响的研究。我们通过提供一些建议来结束本文,以确保未来的研究继续增进我们对性别配额的形式、传播和影响的理解。