Suppr超能文献

基于肌酐的公式并不适用于某些儿科患者肾小球滤过率的估计:来自一家三级儿科肾脏病中心的数据。

Creatinine-based formulas are not ideal to estimate glomerular filtration rate in selected pediatric patients: data from a tertiary pediatric nephrology center.

机构信息

Service de Néphrologie Rhumatologie et Dermatologie Pédiatrique, Centre de Référence Des Maladies Rénales Rares, Filière Maladies Rares ORKID and ERKNet, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.

Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Pediatr Nephrol. 2024 Oct;39(10):3023-3036. doi: 10.1007/s00467-023-06275-4. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evaluating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) remains challenging in pediatrics; new formulas were developed to increase performance of GFR estimation (eGFR). We aimed to evaluate the recently published formulas as applied to another pediatric population.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of 307 patients with a "kidney risk" (mean age 12.1 ± 4.5 years, sex ratio 1/1) assessed in a tertiary pediatric nephrology center and a mean measured GFR (mGFR) using plasma iohexol clearance of 85.5 ± 25.3 mL/min/1.73 m; creatinine levels were measured by IDMS-standardized enzymatic method and cystatin C by immunonephelometry. The following eGFRs were calculated: Schwartz2009, Schwartz-Lyon, CKiDU25creat, and EKFC for eGFR using creatinine (eGFR-creat), CKiDU25cys and FAScys for eGFR using cystatin (eGFR-cys) as well as combined SchwartzCreat-Cys, average (CKiDU25creat-CKiDU25cys), and average (EKFC-FAScys) for eGFR using both biomarkers. The performance of the different formulas was evaluated compared to mGFR by absolute bias measurement and accuracy (p10%, p30%). Results are expressed as mean ± SD.

RESULTS

Creatinine-based formulas and especially the new CKiDU25 and EKFC overestimate GFR, even in children with normal kidney function. However, the bias is constant with these two formulas whatever the age group or gender, contrary to the previously published formulas. In contrast, cystatin C-based equations and combined formulas showed good performance in all age groups and all medical conditions with an acceptable bias and p30%.

CONCLUSIONS

In our pediatric population, the performance of all creatinine-based formulas is inadequate with significant GFR overestimation, mainly in subjects with mGFR > 75 mL/min/1.73 m. Conversely, cystatin C-based or combined formulas have acceptable performance in patients followed in a tertiary pediatric nephrology unit.

摘要

背景

评估肾小球滤过率(GFR)在儿科领域仍然具有挑战性;新的公式被开发出来以提高 GFR 估计的性能(eGFR)。我们旨在评估最近发表的公式在另一个儿科人群中的应用。

方法

本回顾性研究在一个三级儿科肾病中心评估的 307 名具有“肾脏风险”(平均年龄 12.1±4.5 岁,性别比 1/1)的患者队列中进行,使用血浆碘海醇清除率测量得到平均估计肾小球滤过率(mGFR)为 85.5±25.3 mL/min/1.73 m;肌酐水平通过 IDMS 标准化酶法测量,胱抑素 C 通过免疫比浊法测量。计算了以下 eGFR:Schwartz2009、Schwartz-Lyon、CKiDU25creat 和基于肌酐的 EKFC(eGFR-creat)、CKiDU25cys 和基于胱抑素的 FAScys(eGFR-cys)以及 SchwartzCreat-Cys、平均(CKiDU25creat-CKiDU25cys)和平均(EKFC-FAScys)的组合 eGFR。通过绝对偏差测量和准确性(p10%、p30%)来评估不同公式与 mGFR 的性能。结果以平均值±标准差表示。

结果

基于肌酐的公式,尤其是新的 CKiDU25 和 EKFC,即使在肾功能正常的儿童中,也高估了 GFR。然而,与之前发表的公式相反,这两个公式的偏差是恒定的,无论年龄组或性别如何。相比之下,基于胱抑素 C 的方程和组合方程在所有年龄组和所有医疗条件下都表现良好,具有可接受的偏差和 p30%。

结论

在我们的儿科人群中,所有基于肌酐的公式的性能都不理想,存在显著的 GFR 高估,主要是在 mGFR>75 mL/min/1.73 m 的患者中。相反,基于胱抑素 C 的公式或组合公式在三级儿科肾病单位接受治疗的患者中具有可接受的性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验