Suppr超能文献

室内和室外场地自行车测试在铁人三项运动员中的差异与训练环境历史和 BMI 有关:分析和预测公式。

Differences between indoor and outdoor field cycling tests in triathletes are associated with training environment history and BMI: analysis and prediction formula.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, Institute of Sport - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland -

Department of Physiology, Institute of Sport - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2024 Oct;64(10):1039-1047. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.24.15921-X. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients underwent cyclists and triathletes test, train, and race both indoors and outdoors. However, the differences between indoor and outdoor performance remain understudied. This study aimed to analyze the relationship between indoor and outdoor performance in cycling. We investigated the influence of training environment history (indoor vs. outdoor) and application of e-sport platform on the aforementioned relationship.

METHODS

Forty-three well-trained triathletes performed indoor and outdoor field tests to establish maximum sprint power (MSP) and functional threshold power (FTP). The main effects for FTP and MSP were assessed by repeated-measures ANOVA to analyze the differences between power output obtained indoors and outdoors. Multiple covariates, including training environment history and application of ZWIFT e-sport platform, were applied. Multiple linear regression was performed to investigate outdoor FTP prediction based on indoor testing.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found for MSP and FTP obtained indoors and outdoors. However, the high individual variability in the disparity between indoor and outdoor power output (PO) in triathletes was observed. There was a statistically significant interaction between FTP and training environment history (P<0.001 for FTP expressed in Wkg and W) and FTP and BMI (P=0.042 and P=0.034 for FTP expressed in Wkg and W, respectively). The prediction formulas to establish outdoor FTP based on indoor testing had high accuracy (R2 0.80 and 0.68 for full and simple model, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The study underlines the crucial role of the appropriate testing environment, corresponding to the training environment and racing demands. A high individual variability in the disparity between indoor and outdoor PO at FTP are associated with training environment history and BMI. No such interactions were found for MSP.

摘要

背景

患者在室内和室外进行自行车和三项全能运动员测试、训练和比赛。然而,室内和室外表现之间的差异仍有待研究。本研究旨在分析自行车室内和室外性能之间的关系。我们研究了训练环境历史(室内与室外)和电子竞技平台应用对上述关系的影响。

方法

43 名训练有素的三项全能运动员在室内和室外进行了现场测试,以确定最大冲刺功率(MSP)和功能阈值功率(FTP)。采用重复测量方差分析评估主要效应,以分析室内和室外功率输出之间的差异。应用了多个协变量,包括训练环境历史和 ZWIFT 电子竞技平台的应用。进行了多元线性回归,以研究基于室内测试的户外 FTP 预测。

结果

室内和室外获得的 MSP 和 FTP 之间没有显著差异。然而,观察到三项全能运动员室内和室外功率输出之间差异的个体差异很大。FTP 与训练环境历史之间存在统计学上显著的交互作用(以瓦特公斤和瓦特表示的 FTP 的 P<0.001)和 FTP 与 BMI 之间存在统计学上显著的交互作用(以瓦特公斤和瓦特表示的 FTP 的 P=0.042 和 P=0.034)。基于室内测试建立户外 FTP 的预测公式具有很高的准确性(完整模型和简单模型的 R2 分别为 0.80 和 0.68)。

结论

本研究强调了适当测试环境的关键作用,该环境应与训练环境和比赛要求相对应。FTP 时室内和室外 PO 之间的差异存在很大的个体差异,这与训练环境历史和 BMI 有关。MSP 没有发现这种相互作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验