Department of Community Health Sciences and O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17310.
IMPORTANCE: A comprehensive review of the evidence exploring the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guidelines has not been completed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if ERAS guidelines are associated with improved hospital length of stay, hospital readmission, complications, and mortality compared with usual surgical care, and to understand differences in estimates based on study and patient factors. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception until June 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers. Eligible studies were randomized clinical trials that examined ERAS-guided surgery compared with a control group and reported on at least 1 of the outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form. The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Risk of bias was assessed in duplicate using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool estimates for each outcome, and meta-regression identified sources of heterogeneity within each outcome. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary outcomes were hospital length of stay, hospital readmission within 30 days of index discharge, 30-day postoperative complications, and 30-day postoperative mortality. RESULTS: Of the 12 047 references identified, 1493 full texts were screened for eligibility, 495 were included in the systematic review, and 74 RCTs with 9076 participants were included in the meta-analysis. Included studies presented data from 21 countries and 9 ERAS-guided surgical procedures with 15 (20.3%) having a low risk of bias. The mean (SD) Reporting on ERAS Compliance, Outcomes, and Elements Research checklist score was 13.5 (2.3). Hospital length of stay decreased by 1.88 days (95% CI, 0.95-2.81 days; I2 = 86.5%; P < .001) and the risk of complications decreased (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.59-0.87; I2 = 78.6%; P < .001) in the ERAS group. Risk of readmission and mortality were not significant. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this meta-analysis, ERAS guidelines were associated with decreased hospital length of stay and complications. Future studies should aim to improve implementation of ERAS and increase the reach of the guidelines.
重要性:尚未完成对探索术后加速康复 (ERAS) 指南结果的证据的全面审查。
目的:评估 ERAS 指南是否与缩短住院时间、住院 30 天内再入院、并发症和死亡率的改善相关,与常规手术护理相比,以及了解基于研究和患者因素的估计值差异。
数据来源:从创建到 2021 年 6 月,MEDLINE、Embase、护理与联合健康文献累积索引和 Cochrane 中心进行了检索。
研究选择:两名独立审查员筛选标题、摘要和全文文章。合格的研究是随机临床试验,检查了 ERAS 指导下的手术与对照组相比,并报告了至少 1 个结果。
数据提取和综合:使用标准化的数据提取表对数据进行了重复提取。该研究遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具对偏倚风险进行了重复评估。使用随机效应荟萃分析对每个结果的估计值进行汇总,并使用荟萃回归确定每个结果内异质性的来源。
主要结果和措施:主要结果是住院时间、出院后 30 天内住院再入院、30 天术后并发症和 30 天术后死亡率。
结果:在 12047 条参考文献中,有 1493 篇全文进行了资格筛选,495 篇被纳入系统综述,74 项 RCT 中有 9076 名参与者被纳入荟萃分析。纳入的研究来自 21 个国家和 9 项 ERAS 指导的手术,其中 15 项(20.3%)具有低偏倚风险。报告 ERAS 依从性、结果和元素研究检查表的平均(SD)得分为 13.5(2.3)。住院时间缩短 1.88 天(95%CI,0.95-2.81 天;I2=86.5%;P<.001),并发症风险降低(风险比,0.71;95%CI,0.59-0.87;I2=78.6%;P<.001)。在 ERAS 组中,再入院和死亡率的风险没有显著差异。
结论和相关性:在这项荟萃分析中,ERAS 指南与住院时间缩短和并发症减少相关。未来的研究应旨在提高 ERAS 的实施并扩大指南的覆盖面。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-15
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-2-20
J Vasc Surg. 2019-3-25
J Med Internet Res. 2025-8-26
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025-5-17
Implement Sci. 2022-7-23
World J Surg Oncol. 2021-6-29