• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院安全的演变因素:医院不良事件的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Evolving Factors in Hospital Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital Adverse Events.

机构信息

From the Department of Critical Care Medicine.

Department of Community Health Sciences & O'Brien Institute of Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1285-e1295. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000889.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000000889
PMID:34469915
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the frequency of hospital adverse events (AEs) and explore the rate of AEs over time, and across and within hospital populations.

METHODS

Validated search terms were run in MEDLINE and EMBASE; gray literature and references of included studies were also searched. Studies of any design or language providing an estimate of AEs within the hospital were eligible. Studies were excluded if they only provided an estimate for a specific AE, a subgroup of hospital patients or children. Data were abstracted in duplicate using a standardized data abstraction form. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis estimated the occurrence of hospital AEs, and meta-regression explored the association between hospital AEs, and patient and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 45,426 unique references were identified; 1,265 full-texts were reviewed and 94 studies representing 590 million admissions from 25 countries from 1961 to 2014 were included. The incidence of hospital AEs was 8.6 per 100 patient admissions (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.3 to 8.9; I2 = 100%, P < 0.001). Half of the AEs were preventable (52.6%), and a third resulted in moderate/significant harm (39.7%). The most evaluated AEs were surgical AEs, drug-related AEs, and nosocomial infections. The occurrence of AEs increased by year (95% CI, -0.05 to -0.04; P < 0.001) and patient age (95% CI = -0.15 to -0.14; P < 0.001), and varied by country income level and study characteristics. Patient sex, hospital type, hospital service, and geographical location were not associated with AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospital AEs are common, and reported rates are increasing in the literature. Given the increase in AEs over time, hospitals should reinvest in improving hospital safety with a focus on interventions targeted toward the more than half of AEs that are preventable.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在估计医院不良事件(AE)的发生频率,并探讨其随时间变化的发生率,以及在医院人群中的分布情况。

方法

在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 中使用经过验证的检索词进行检索;还检索了纳入研究的灰色文献和参考文献。符合条件的研究为任何设计或语言,提供了医院内 AE 估计值。如果研究仅提供特定 AE、特定医院患者亚组或儿童的估计值,则将其排除在外。使用标准化数据提取表格对数据进行了重复提取。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。采用随机效应荟萃分析估计医院 AE 的发生情况,并进行荟萃回归以探讨医院 AE 与患者和医院特征之间的关系。

结果

共确定了 45426 个独特的参考文献;对 1265 篇全文进行了审查,纳入了来自 25 个国家的 94 项研究,这些研究共涉及 5.9 亿例住院患者,时间跨度为 1961 年至 2014 年。医院 AE 的发生率为每 100 例患者住院 8.6 例(95%置信区间[CI]:8.3 至 8.9;I2=100%,P<0.001)。一半的 AE 是可以预防的(52.6%),三分之一导致中度/显著伤害(39.7%)。评价最多的 AE 是手术 AE、药物相关 AE 和医院获得性感染。AE 的发生随着时间的推移(95%CI:-0.05 至 -0.04;P<0.001)和患者年龄(95%CI:-0.15 至 -0.14;P<0.001)而增加,且因国家收入水平和研究特征而异。患者性别、医院类型、医院服务和地理位置与 AE 无关。

结论

医院 AE 很常见,且文献报道的发生率呈上升趋势。鉴于 AE 随时间的增加,医院应重新投资于改善医院安全,重点关注针对一半以上可预防 AE 的干预措施。

相似文献

1
Evolving Factors in Hospital Safety: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Hospital Adverse Events.医院安全的演变因素:医院不良事件的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Patient Saf. 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e1285-e1295. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000889.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review.住院不良事件的发生率、类型、后果及可预防性——一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z.
4
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿科住院患者不良事件的发生率和特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):133-149. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Adverse events and potentially preventable deaths in Dutch hospitals: results of a retrospective patient record review study.荷兰医院中的不良事件及潜在可预防死亡:一项回顾性患者病历审查研究的结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Aug;18(4):297-302. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025924.
6
Incidence of adverse events, preventability and mortality in gynaecological hospital admissions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.妇科住院患者不良事件的发生率、可预防性及死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Apr;59(2):195-200. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12937. Epub 2019 Jan 20.
7
Adverse Events in Hospitalized Pediatric Patients.住院儿科患者的不良事件。
Pediatrics. 2018 Aug;142(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3360. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
8
9
Patient and hospital characteristics that influence incidence of adverse events in acute public hospitals in Portugal: a retrospective cohort study.影响葡萄牙急性公立医院不良事件发生率的患者和医院特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Mar 1;30(2):132-137. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx190.
10
Variation in detected adverse events using trigger tools: A systematic review and meta-analysis.使用触发工具检测到的不良事件的变化:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 1;17(9):e0273800. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273800. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Contributing Factors to Safety: What Hospitalized Patients Can Tell Us? A Cross-Sectional Study.安全的影响因素:住院患者能告诉我们什么?一项横断面研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2025 Sep;40(5):1083-1092. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3945. Epub 2025 May 16.
2
Nurse judgements of hospitalized patients' safety concerns are affected by patient, nurse and event characteristics: A factorial survey experiment.护士对住院患者安全问题的判断受患者、护士和事件特征的影响:一项析因调查实验。
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Feb;34(2):493-506. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17372. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Guidelines and Hospital Length of Stay, Readmission, Complications, and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
术后恢复加速指南与住院时间、再入院率、并发症和死亡率:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2417310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17310.
4
Avoiding adverse events in interventional radiology - a systematic review on the instruments.避免介入放射学中的不良事件——关于器械的系统评价
CVIR Endovasc. 2024 Jan 3;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s42155-023-00413-7.
5
Patient safety discourse in a pandemic: a Twitter hashtag analysis study on #PatientSafety.大流行中的患者安全论述:关于#PatientSafety 的 Twitter 话题标签分析研究
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 16;11:1268730. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268730. eCollection 2023.
6
Effects of a management team training intervention on the compliance with a surgical site infection bundle: a before-after study in operating theatres in the Netherlands.管理团队培训干预对手术部位感染预防包依从性的影响:荷兰手术室的前后研究
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):e073137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073137.
7
Estonian adverse events study for multimorbid patients using Estonian Trigger Tool (MUPETT-MUltimorbid Patients-Estonian Trigger Tool). Development of Estonian trigger tool for multimorbid patients. A study protocol for mixed-methods study.爱沙尼亚多系统疾病患者不良事件研究采用爱沙尼亚触发工具(MUPETT-MUltimorbid Patients-Estonian Trigger Tool)。多系统疾病患者爱沙尼亚触发工具的开发。一项混合方法研究的研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0280200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280200. eCollection 2023.
8
Incidence and characteristics of adverse events in paediatric inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿科住院患者不良事件的发生率和特征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Mar;32(3):133-149. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015298. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
9
Patient Voices in Hospital Safety during the COVID-19 Pandemic.患者在 COVID-19 大流行期间对医院安全的看法。
Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Jan;32(1):105-114. doi: 10.1177/10547738221129711. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
10
Form for planning and elaborating high fidelity simulation scenarios: A validation study.高保真模拟场景规划和阐述表:一项验证研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0274239. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274239. eCollection 2022.