Station d'Écologie Théorique et Expérimentale, UAR2029, CNRS, Moulis 09200, France.
CNRS/Sorbonne Université, UMR7621 Laboratoire d'Océanographie Microbienne, Banyuls-sur-Mer, France.
Proc Biol Sci. 2024 Jun;291(2025):20240256. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0256. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
Classical theories predict that relatively constant environments should generally favour specialists, while fluctuating environments should be selected for generalists. However, theoretical and empirical results have pointed out that generalist organisms might, on the contrary, perform poorly under fluctuations. In particular, if generalism is underlaid by phenotypic plasticity, performance of generalists should be modulated by the temporal characteristics of environmental fluctuations. Here, we used experiments in microcosms of ciliates and a mathematical model to test whether the period or autocorrelation of thermal fluctuations mediate links between the level of generalism and the performance of organisms under fluctuations. In the experiment, thermal fluctuations consistently impeded performance compared with constant conditions. However, the intensity of this effect depended on the level of generalism: while the more specialist strains performed better under fast or negatively autocorrelated fluctuations, plastic generalists performed better under slow or positively autocorrelated fluctuations. Our model suggests that these effects of fluctuations on organisms' performance may result from a time delay in the expression of plasticity, restricting its benefits to slow enough fluctuations. This study points out the need to further investigate the temporal dynamics of phenotypic plasticity to better predict its fitness consequences under environmental fluctuations.
经典理论预测,相对稳定的环境通常有利于专家,而波动的环境则更有利于通才。然而,理论和实证结果指出,相反,通才生物在波动下可能表现不佳。特别是,如果通才是由表型可塑性支撑的,那么通才的表现应该受到环境波动的时间特征的调节。在这里,我们使用草履虫的微宇宙实验和一个数学模型来测试热波动的周期或自相关性是否介导了通才水平与生物体在波动下的表现之间的联系。在实验中,与恒定条件相比,热波动始终会阻碍表现。然而,这种效应的强度取决于通才的水平:虽然更专业的菌株在快速或负自相关波动下表现更好,而具有可塑性的通才在缓慢或正自相关波动下表现更好。我们的模型表明,波动对生物体表现的这些影响可能是由于可塑性表达的时间延迟,限制了其在足够缓慢的波动下的益处。这项研究指出,需要进一步研究表型可塑性的时间动态,以更好地预测其在环境波动下的适应度后果。