Suppr超能文献

双相情感障碍中皮肤电活动的睡眠-觉醒变化

Sleep-wake variations of electrodermal activity in bipolar disorder.

作者信息

Valenzuela-Pascual Clàudia, Mas Ariadna, Borràs Roger, Anmella Gerard, Sanabra Miriam, González-Campos Meritxell, Valentí Marc, Pacchiarotti Isabella, Benabarre Antoni, Grande Iria, De Prisco Michele, Oliva Vincenzo, Bastidas Anna, Agasi Isabel, Young Allan H, Garriga Marina, Murru Andrea, Corponi Filippo, Li Bryan M, de Looff Peter, Vieta Eduard, Hidalgo-Mazzei Diego

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

Bipolar and Depressive Disorders Unit, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Mar;151(3):412-425. doi: 10.1111/acps.13718. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Affective states influence the sympathetic nervous system, inducing variations in electrodermal activity (EDA), however, EDA association with bipolar disorder (BD) remains uncertain in real-world settings due to confounders like physical activity and temperature. We analysed EDA separately during sleep and wakefulness due to varying confounders and potential differences in mood state discrimination capacities.

METHODS

We monitored EDA from 102 participants with BD including 35 manic, 29 depressive, 38 euthymic patients, and 38 healthy controls (HC), for 48 h. Fifteen EDA features were inferred by mixed-effect models for repeated measures considering sleep state, group and covariates.

RESULTS

Thirteen EDA feature models were significantly influenced by sleep state, notably including phasic peaks (p < 0.001). During wakefulness, phasic peaks showed different values for mania (M [SD] = 6.49 [5.74, 7.23]), euthymia (5.89 [4.83, 6.94]), HC (3.04 [1.65, 4.42]), and depression (3.00 [2.07, 3.92]). Four phasic features during wakefulness better discriminated between HC and mania or euthymia, and between depression and euthymia or mania, compared to sleep. Mixed symptoms, average skin temperature, and anticholinergic medication affected the models, while sex and age did not.

CONCLUSION

EDA measured from awake recordings better distinguished between BD states than sleep recordings, when controlled by confounders.

摘要

背景

情感状态会影响交感神经系统,导致皮肤电活动(EDA)发生变化,然而,在现实环境中,由于身体活动和温度等混杂因素,EDA与双相情感障碍(BD)之间的关联仍不明确。由于混杂因素不同以及情绪状态辨别能力可能存在差异,我们分别在睡眠和清醒状态下分析了EDA。

方法

我们对102名BD患者(包括35名躁狂患者、29名抑郁患者、38名心境正常患者)和38名健康对照者(HC)的EDA进行了48小时监测。通过考虑睡眠状态、组别和协变量的重复测量混合效应模型推断出15个EDA特征。

结果

13个EDA特征模型受睡眠状态的显著影响,尤其是相位峰值(p < 0.001)。在清醒状态下,相位峰值在躁狂(M [标准差] = 6.49 [5.74, 7.23])、心境正常(5.89 [4.83, 6.94])、HC(3.04 [1.65, 4.42])和抑郁(3.00 [2.07, 3.92])状态下呈现不同数值。与睡眠相比,清醒状态下的四个相位特征在区分HC与躁狂或心境正常,以及抑郁与心境正常或躁狂方面表现更佳。混合症状、平均皮肤温度和抗胆碱能药物会影响模型,而性别和年龄则不会。

结论

在控制混杂因素的情况下,从清醒记录中测得的EDA比睡眠记录能更好地区分BD状态。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验