Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe University, 10-2 Tomogaoka 7-Chome, Suma-ku, Kobe, 654-0142, Japan.
Cardiovascular Stroke Renal Project (CRP), Kobe, Japan.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 18;14(1):14037. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65001-8.
This study aimed to investigate the rate of sedentary behaviour and differences in physical outcomes and activities of daily living (ADL) based on sedentary behaviour time of hospitalized older cardiovascular disease patients undergoing phase I cardiac rehabilitation. Older cardiovascular disease patients were enrolled from October 2020 to September 2023 and were divided into the high sedentary behaviour group (≥ 480 min/day) and low sedentary behaviour group (< 480 min/day). Patients' clinical characteristics, usual gait speed, and Five Times Sit to Stand Test time were compared as indices of physical outcomes. Motor, cognitive, and total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores were used as indices of ADL and compared between groups using analysis of covariance. Final analysis included 402 patients (mean age: 76.7 years, female: 35.3%). The high sedentary behaviour group included 48.5% of the study patients. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, gait speed (0.80 ± 0.27 vs. 0.96 ± 0.23 m/s, p < 0.001) was lower and FTSST time (11.31 ± 4.19 vs. 9.39 ± 3.11 s, p < 0.001) was higher in the high sedentary behaviour group versus low sedentary behaviour group. Motor (85.82 ± 8.82 vs. 88.09 ± 5.04 points, p < 0.001), cognitive (33.32 ± 2.93 vs. 34.04 ± 2.24 points, p < 0.001), and total FIM scores (119.13 ± 10.66 vs. 122.02 ± 6.30 points, p < 0.001) were significantly lower in the high sedentary behaviour group versus low sedentary behaviour group after adjustment. In older cardiovascular disease patients in phase I cardiac rehabilitation, sedentary behaviour time might influence physical outcomes and ADL at discharge. It is thus important to consider the amount of sedentary behaviour time spent by these patients during daily life while hospitalized.
本研究旨在探讨接受 I 期心脏康复的老年心血管疾病住院患者根据久坐行为时间的久坐行为率以及身体结果和日常生活活动(ADL)的差异。从 2020 年 10 月至 2023 年 9 月招募老年心血管疾病患者,并将其分为高久坐行为组(≥480 分钟/天)和低久坐行为组(<480 分钟/天)。将患者的临床特征、通常的步行速度和 5 次坐立站起测试时间作为身体结果的指标进行比较。使用协方差分析比较组间运动、认知和总功能性独立性测量(FIM)评分作为 ADL 的指标。最终分析包括 402 名患者(平均年龄:76.7 岁,女性:35.3%)。高久坐行为组占研究患者的 48.5%。在调整基线特征后,与低久坐行为组相比,高久坐行为组的步行速度(0.80±0.27 与 0.96±0.23m/s,p<0.001)较低,FTSST 时间(11.31±4.19 与 9.39±3.11s,p<0.001)较高。运动(85.82±8.82 与 88.09±5.04 分,p<0.001)、认知(33.32±2.93 与 34.04±2.24 分,p<0.001)和总 FIM 评分(119.13±10.66 与 122.02±6.30 分,p<0.001)在高久坐行为组均显著低于低久坐行为组。在 I 期心脏康复的老年心血管疾病患者中,久坐行为时间可能会影响出院时的身体结果和 ADL。因此,在住院期间,有必要考虑这些患者日常生活中久坐行为时间的多少。