• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

什么样的雇主才算得上是“理想雇主”?一项定性三角测量研究。

What constitutes an employer of choice? A qualitative triangulation investigation.

机构信息

Human Resources Management Department, College of Business, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Hum Resour Health. 2024 Jun 18;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00928-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12960-024-00928-7
PMID:38890735
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11186138/
Abstract

Employer of choice (EOC) is a relatively new phenomenon, particularly in Human Resources Management. Existing employees and prospective talent have reasons and expectations to designate an employer as an EOC. While EOC has received extensive attention from both academics and practitioners over the past few years, the work has mostly focused on managerial and marketing perspectives, and thus far lacks a strong theoretical foundation. Drawing on Social Exchange Theory (SET), based on Human Resources and employees' perceptions and experiences, this research aims to explore and investigate the factors that constitute/designate an employer as an Employer of Choice EOC. Two qualitative triangulated data sets were collected from existing full-time employees at a Saudi multinational corporation: open interviews and document analysis (cross-sectional and longitudinal). Thematic analysis (TA) was employed to analyze both methods. The findings reveal that company image, training, and development, satisfaction, involvement and commitment, fairness, work culture, reward, opportunities for growth, teamwork, motivation, and corporate social responsibility are the factors that lead employees to designate an employer as an EOC. This research contributes to knowledge conceptually, theoretically, and empirically, mainly in the area of Human Resources Management. This research represents one of the first studies to empirically identify and investigate employee-related factors and evaluate them all together in a multinational Saudi organization. Recognizing the findings of this empirical-based research assists HR managers in designating their organizations as an EOC for current employees and prospective talents.

摘要

雇主品牌(EOC)是一个相对较新的现象,特别是在人力资源管理领域。现有员工和潜在人才都有指定雇主为 EOC 的理由和期望。尽管 EOC 在过去几年中受到了学术界和从业者的广泛关注,但这项工作主要集中在管理和营销视角上,迄今为止缺乏坚实的理论基础。本研究以社会交换理论(SET)为基础,基于人力资源和员工的感知和经验,旨在探讨和调查构成/指定雇主为 EOC 的因素。从沙特跨国公司的现有全职员工中收集了两个定性三角数据集:开放式访谈和文件分析(横断面和纵向)。采用主题分析(TA)对两种方法进行分析。研究结果表明,公司形象、培训与发展、满意度、参与度和忠诚度、公平性、工作文化、薪酬、成长机会、团队合作、激励和企业社会责任是促使员工指定雇主为 EOC 的因素。本研究在概念、理论和经验上为知识做出了贡献,主要在人力资源管理领域。本研究代表了首批在跨国沙特组织中实证确定和调查员工相关因素并对其进行综合评估的研究之一。认识到这项基于实证的研究结果有助于人力资源经理为现有员工和潜在人才指定他们的组织为 EOC。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2259/11186138/7f6a1e085309/12960_2024_928_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2259/11186138/7f6a1e085309/12960_2024_928_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2259/11186138/7f6a1e085309/12960_2024_928_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What constitutes an employer of choice? A qualitative triangulation investigation.什么样的雇主才算得上是“理想雇主”?一项定性三角测量研究。
Hum Resour Health. 2024 Jun 18;22(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12960-024-00928-7.
2
3
Critical reflections on the currently leading definition of sustainable employability.对当前可持续就业能力主导定义的批判性反思。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016 Jun 1;42(6):557-560. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3585. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
4
Employer support for innovative work and employees' job satisfaction and job-related stress.雇主对创新工作的支持与员工的工作满意度及工作相关压力
J Occup Health. 2014;56(4):244-51. doi: 10.1539/joh.12-0192-oa. Epub 2014 May 15.
5
Physical activity in paid work time for desk-based employees: a qualitative study of employers' and employees' perspectives.工作时间内的身体活动对伏案工作者的影响:雇主和员工观点的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 6;20(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08580-1.
6
Factors relating to organizational commitment of older male employees in Japan.与日本老年男性员工组织承诺相关的因素。
J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2005 Sep;20(3):181-90. doi: 10.1007/s10823-006-9002-6.
7
Workplace empowerment, psychological empowerment and work-related wellbeing in southeast Asian employees: a cross-sectional survey.东南亚员工的工作场所赋权、心理赋权与工作相关幸福感:一项横断面调查。
Health Promot Int. 2022 Aug 1;37(4). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daac113.
8
Correlates of employees' perceptions of a healthy work environment.员工对健康工作环境认知的相关因素。
Am J Health Promot. 2003 Jul-Aug;17(6):390-9. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-17.6.390.
9
The Benefits of an Employee-Friendly Company on Job Attitudes and Health of Employees: Findings from Matched Employer-Employee Data.员工友好型公司对员工工作态度和健康的益处:来自匹配的雇主-员工数据的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 25;19(15):9046. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159046.
10
Living the employer brand during a crisis? A qualitative study on internal employer branding in times of the COVID-19 pandemic.在危机期间践行雇主品牌?新冠疫情时期的内部雇主品牌建设之质化研究。
PLoS One. 2024 May 13;19(5):e0303361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303361. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance.同事能成就一个地方吗?关于同事对认知、态度、组织公民行为和绩效影响的概念性综合与元分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Sep;93(5):1082-103. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082.
2
Rethinking work-health models for the new global economy: a qualitative analysis of emerging dimensions of work.重新思考新全球经济下的工作与健康模式:对工作新维度的定性分析
Work. 2004;23(1):3-18.
3
A simple statistical method for measuring how life events affect happiness.
一种衡量生活事件如何影响幸福感的简单统计方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;31(6):1139-44; discussion 1144-46. doi: 10.1093/ije/31.6.1139.
4
Personality and job satisfaction: the mediating role of job characteristics.人格与工作满意度:工作特征的中介作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Apr;85(2):237-49. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.237.
5
Interpersonal accommodation.人际适应
Am Psychol. 1968 Jun;23(6):399-410. doi: 10.1037/h0026482.