Rungruangsaphakun Jurairat, Ayimbila Francis, Nakphaichit Massalin, Keawsompong Suttipun
Specialized Research Unit: Prebiotics and Probiotics for Health, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Agro-Industry, Kasetsart University (CASAF, NRU-KU), Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Center for Advanced Studies for Agriculture and Food, KU Institute of Advanced Studies, Kasetsart University (CASAF, NRU-KU), Bangkok 10900, Thailand.
Animals (Basel). 2024 Jun 4;14(11):1677. doi: 10.3390/ani14111677.
This study aimed to compare the effects of hydrolyzed copra meal (HCM) inclusion at 1% on its in vitro digestibility and the microbiota and cecum fermentation using the gut microbiota of weaned swine, targeting microbial community and short-chain fatty acids (SCF). For this reason, three treatments were considered: control (no copra meal), 1% non-hydrolyzed copra meal (CM), and 1% HCM. Non-defatted copra meal was hydrolyzed and analyzed (reducing sugars and total carbohydrates) in our laboratory. For digestion, microbiota identification, and fermentation assays, fresh fecal samples from two weaned pigs (1 month old) were used. Three replicates of each treatment were employed. HCM was more digestible, with approximately 0.68 g of hydrolysate recovered after simulated digestion compared to 0.82 g of hydrolysate recovered from CM. This was shown by Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) images. Also, the three swine shared the majority of microbial species identified at the phylum and family levels. There were no differences ( > 0.05) between treatments in the microbial community and SCFA during fermentation. However, higher Chao-1 and Shannon indexes were observed in CM and HCM treatments. HCM was also found to be capable of preserving and at the phylum level, while at the family level, both treatments may help , , , and survive in the long term. Also, there was a potential trend of increasing acetic acid and butyric acid in the CM and HCM treatments. While HCM shows promise in potentially modulating the gut microbiota of weaned swine, additional research is required to investigate the effects of higher doses of HCM on swine performance parameters.
本研究旨在比较添加1%水解椰肉粕(HCM)对断奶仔猪肠道微生物群和盲肠发酵的体外消化率、微生物群的影响,以微生物群落和短链脂肪酸(SCF)为目标。因此,考虑了三种处理方法:对照(不添加椰肉粕)、1%非水解椰肉粕(CM)和1% HCM。在我们实验室对未脱脂椰肉粕进行了水解并分析了(还原糖和总碳水化合物)。为了进行消化、微生物鉴定和发酵试验,使用了两头断奶仔猪(1月龄)的新鲜粪便样本。每个处理进行三次重复。HCM的消化率更高,模拟消化后回收的水解产物约为0.68 g,而从CM回收的水解产物为0.82 g。扫描电子显微镜(SEM)图像显示了这一点。此外,这三头猪在门和科水平上共有大多数已鉴定的微生物物种。发酵过程中,各处理之间的微生物群落和短链脂肪酸没有差异(>0.05)。然而,在CM和HCM处理中观察到较高的Chao-1和香农指数。还发现HCM能够在门水平上保留 和 ,而在科水平上,两种处理都可能有助于 、 、 和 长期存活。此外,CM和HCM处理中乙酸和丁酸有增加的潜在趋势。虽然HCM在潜在调节断奶仔猪肠道微生物群方面显示出前景,但需要进一步研究以调查更高剂量的HCM对猪生产性能参数的影响。