Berrios G E
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985 May;48(5):393-400. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.48.5.393.
Nineteenth century views on the interaction between dementia, depressive illness, general paralysis and brain localisation are discussed in the context of a book by A Mairet entitled: Melancholic Dementia. It is shown that by 1883 there was already awareness of the fact that severe affective disorder could lead to cognitive impairment. General paralysis was the commonest diagnosis put forward to account for patients with depression who went on to develop dementia. Patients so diagnosed, however, often recovered and clinical and statistical analysis of Mairet's case histories suggests that some were in fact suffering from depressive pseudodementia. Evidence is marshalled to show that during the 19th century there was wide disagreement concerning the clinical domain, course and even histopathology of general paralysis. This casts doubt on the traditional view that this condition served as "a paradigm" for other psychiatric diseases during this period. It is shown that by the turn of the century these difficulties led to a redefinition of the concept of dementia and to a marked narrowing of the clinical bounds of general paralysis.
在A·迈雷所著的《忧郁性痴呆》一书中,探讨了19世纪关于痴呆、抑郁性疾病、全身麻痹与脑定位之间相互作用的观点。结果表明,到1883年时,人们已经认识到严重的情感障碍可能导致认知障碍。全身麻痹是为患有抑郁症并进而发展为痴呆的患者提出的最常见诊断。然而,如此诊断的患者往往会康复,对迈雷病例记录的临床和统计分析表明,其中一些患者实际上患有抑郁性假性痴呆。有证据表明,在19世纪,关于全身麻痹的临床领域、病程甚至组织病理学存在广泛分歧。这对传统观点提出了质疑,即在此期间这种疾病是其他精神疾病的“范例”。结果表明,到世纪之交,这些困难导致了痴呆概念的重新定义以及全身麻痹临床范围的显著缩小。