Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Technical University of Munich, 80802 Munich, Germany.
Center of Allergy & Environment (ZAUM), Technical University of Munich, Helmholtz Center Munich, 80802 Munich, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jun 3;25(11):6158. doi: 10.3390/ijms25116158.
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic inflammatory skin diseases, with an increasing number of targeted therapies available. While biologics to treat AD exclusively target the key cytokines of type 2 immunity, Janus kinase inhibitors target a broad variety of cytokines, including IFN-γ. To better stratify patients for optimal treatment outcomes, the identification and characterization of subgroups, especially with regard to their IFNG expression, is of great relevance, as the role of IFNG in AD has not yet been fully clarified. This study aims to define AD subgroups based on their lesional IFNG expression and to characterize them based on their gene expression, T cell secretome and clinical attributes. RNA from the lesional and non-lesional biopsies of 48 AD patients was analyzed by RNA sequencing. Based on IFNG gene expression and the release of IFN-γ by lesional T cells, this cohort was categorized into three IFNG groups (high, medium, and low) using unsupervised clustering. The low IFNG group showed features of extrinsic AD with a higher prevalence of atopic comorbidities and impaired epidermal lipid synthesis. In contrast, patients in the high IFNG group had a higher average age and an activation of additional pro-inflammatory pathways. On the cellular level, higher amounts of M1 macrophages and natural killer cell signaling were detected in the high IFNG group compared to the low IFNG group by a deconvolution algorithm. However, both groups shared a common dupilumab response gene signature, indicating that type 2 immunity is the dominant immune shift in both subgroups. In summary, high and low IFNG subgroups correspond to intrinsic and extrinsic AD classifications and might be considered in the future for evaluating therapeutic efficacy or non-responders.
特应性皮炎(AD)是最常见的慢性炎症性皮肤病之一,目前有越来越多的靶向治疗方法。虽然专门用于治疗 AD 的生物制剂仅针对 2 型免疫的关键细胞因子,但 JAK 抑制剂则针对多种细胞因子,包括 IFN-γ。为了更好地为患者分层以获得最佳治疗效果,确定和描述亚组,特别是其 IFNG 表达情况,具有重要意义,因为 IFNG 在 AD 中的作用尚未完全阐明。本研究旨在根据病变 IFNG 表达定义 AD 亚组,并根据其基因表达、T 细胞分泌组和临床特征对其进行特征描述。通过 RNA 测序分析了 48 名 AD 患者病变和非病变活检的 RNA。根据 IFNG 基因表达和病变 T 细胞释放 IFN-γ,本队列使用无监督聚类分为三组 IFNG 组(高、中、低)。低 IFNG 组表现为特应性皮炎的外在特征,特应性合并症和表皮脂质合成受损的患病率更高。相比之下,高 IFNG 组的患者年龄平均更高,并且有更多的促炎途径被激活。在细胞水平上,通过去卷积算法,高 IFNG 组中检测到更高数量的 M1 巨噬细胞和自然杀伤细胞信号。然而,这两个组都具有共同的 dupilumab 反应基因特征,表明两种亚组中 2 型免疫是主要的免疫转移。总之,高 IFNG 和低 IFNG 亚组分别对应于内在和外在 AD 分类,在未来可能用于评估治疗效果或非应答者。