Choi Ji-Hoon, Kwon Chang Hee
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 2;13(11):3285. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113285.
: The effectiveness of a rhythm control strategy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF < 50%) in real-world practice remains uncertain. Our objective was to evaluate the real-world outcomes of a rhythm control strategy in patients with AF and reduced LVEF, focusing on changes in LV systolic function and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels. : The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 80 patients with concurrent AF and reduced LVEF who underwent rhythm control therapy between March 2015 and December 2021. : The patients had an average age of 63.6 years and an initial LVEF of 34.3%. Sinus rhythm was restored using anti-arrhythmic drugs (38, 47.5%) or electrical cardioversion (42, 52.5%). Over a follow-up period of 53.0 months, AF recurred in 65% of patients, with 57.7% undergoing catheter ablation. Significant improvements were noted in LVEF (from 34.3% to 55.1%, < 0.001) and BNP levels (from 752 pg/mL to 72 pg/mL, < 0.001) at the last follow-up. Nearly all patients (97.5%) continued with the rhythm control strategy during the follow-up period. : In real-world settings, a rhythm control strategy proves to be feasible and effective for improving LVEF and reducing BNP levels in AF patients with reduced LVEF.
在现实临床实践中,节律控制策略对于心房颤动(AF)且左心室射血分数降低(LVEF<50%)的患者的有效性仍不确定。我们的目的是评估节律控制策略在AF且LVEF降低患者中的实际临床结局,重点关注左心室收缩功能和脑钠肽(BNP)水平的变化。本研究回顾性分析了2015年3月至2021年12月期间接受节律控制治疗的80例合并AF且LVEF降低患者的病历。患者平均年龄63.6岁,初始LVEF为34.3%。使用抗心律失常药物(38例,47.5%)或电复律(42例,52.5%)恢复窦性心律。在53.0个月的随访期内,65%的患者房颤复发,其中57.7%接受了导管消融。末次随访时,LVEF(从34.3%提高到55.1%,P<0.001)和BNP水平(从752 pg/mL降至72 pg/mL,P<0.001)有显著改善。几乎所有患者(97.5%)在随访期间继续采用节律控制策略。在现实临床环境中,节律控制策略对于改善AF且LVEF降低患者的LVEF及降低BNP水平是可行且有效的。