Suppr超能文献

通过免疫疗法治疗晚期胆管癌的受限平均生存时间评估总生存期:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Evaluation of Overall Survival by Restricted Mean Survival Time of Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer treated with Immunotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Mauro Ezequiel, Sanduzzi-Zamparelli Marco, Sauri Tamara, Soler Alexandre, Iserte Gemma, Fortuny Marta, Forner Alejandro

机构信息

Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Group, IDIBAPS, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), 28029 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 30;16(11):2077. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112077.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

For biliary tract cancer (BTC), the addition of immunotherapy (durvalumab or pembrolizumab) to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis) significantly improved overall survival (OS) in phase 3 clinical trials (RCTs). However, the interpretation and magnitude of the treatment effect is challenging because OS Kaplan-Meier curves violate the proportional hazards (PH) assumption. Analysis using restricted mean survival time (RMST) allows quantification of the benefits in the absence of PH. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the benefit of immunotherapy-based regimens for OS at 24 months using RMST analysis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using studies published up to 8 November 2023. Only phase 3 RCTs evaluating the use of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 combined with GemCis and reporting OS were included. KM curves for OS were digitized, and the data were reconstructed. A meta-analysis for OS by RMST at 24 months was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1754 participants from the TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials were included. In TOPAZ-1, RMSTs at 24 months were 13.52 (7.92) and 12.21 (7.22) months with GemCis plus durvalumab and GemCis alone, respectively. In KEYNOTE-966, RMSTs at 24 months were 13.60 (7.76) and 12.45 (7.73) months with GemCis plus pembrolizumab and GemCis alone, respectively. Immunotherapy-based regimens showed a mean OS difference at 24 months by an RMST of 1.21 months [(95% CI: 0.49-1.93), < 0.001, I = 0%].

CONCLUSIONS

Immunotherapy-based regimens improve OS in advanced BTC. Given this magnitude of benefit, it is essential to weigh up individual patient factors, preferences, and potential risks. RMST analysis provides valuable information to patients and physicians, facilitating decision-making in a value-based medical environment.

摘要

背景

对于胆管癌(BTC),在3期临床试验(RCT)中,在吉西他滨和顺铂(GemCis)基础上加用免疫疗法(度伐利尤单抗或帕博利珠单抗)可显著改善总生存期(OS)。然而,由于OS的Kaplan-Meier曲线违反了比例风险(PH)假设,治疗效果的解读和程度具有挑战性。使用受限平均生存时间(RMST)进行分析可在不存在PH的情况下量化获益情况。本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在使用RMST分析评估基于免疫疗法的方案在24个月时对OS的获益情况。

方法

使用截至2023年11月8日发表的研究进行系统评价。仅纳入评估抗PD-1/PD-L1联合GemCis使用情况并报告OS的3期RCT。将OS的KM曲线数字化并重建数据。对24个月时基于RMST的OS进行荟萃分析。

结果

共纳入来自TOPAZ-1和KEYNOTE-966试验的1754名参与者。在TOPAZ-1试验中,吉西他滨加度伐利尤单抗组和单纯吉西他滨组24个月时的RMST分别为13.52(7.92)个月和12.21(7.22)个月。在KEYNOTE-966试验中,吉西他滨加帕博利珠单抗组和单纯吉西他滨组24个月时的RMST分别为13.60(7.76)个月和12.45(7.73)个月。基于免疫疗法的方案在24个月时经RMST分析显示平均OS差异为1.21个月[(95%CI:0.49-1.93),P<0.001,I²=0%]。

结论

基于免疫疗法的方案可改善晚期BTC的OS。鉴于这种获益程度,权衡个体患者因素、偏好和潜在风险至关重要。RMST分析为患者和医生提供了有价值的信息,有助于在基于价值的医疗环境中进行决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2609/11171222/5d66c632c7b8/cancers-16-02077-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验