Schnaiter Simon, Schamschula Esther, Laschtowiczka Juliane, Fiegl Heidelinde, Zschocke Johannes, Zeimet Alain, Wimmer Katharina, Reimer Daniel
Institute of Human Genetics, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 3;16(11):2129. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112129.
Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has evolved into a major diagnostic marker in high-grade ovarian cancer (HGOC), predicting the response to poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and also platinum-based therapy. In addition to HRD, the type of peritoneal tumor spread influences the treatment response and patient survival; miliary type tumor spread has a poorer predicted outcome than non-miliary type tumor spread.
Known methods for HRD assessment were adapted for our technical requirements and the predictive-value integrated genomic instability score (PIGIS) for HRD assessment evolved as an outcome. PIGIS was validated in HGOC samples from 122 patients. We used PIGIS to analyze whether the type of tumor spread correlated with HRD status and whether this had an impact on survival.
We demonstrated that PIGIS can discriminate HRD-positive from HRD-negative samples. Tumors with a miliary tumor spread are HRD-negative and have a very bad prognosis with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 15.6 months and an overall survival (OS) of 3.9 years. However, HRD-negative non-miliary spreading tumors in our cohort had a much better prognosis (PFS 35.4 months, OS 8.9 years); similar to HRD-positive tumors (PFS 34.7 months, OS 8.9 years).
Our results indicate that in a predominantly PARPi naïve cohort, the type of tumor spread and concomitant cytoreduction efficiency is a better predictor of survival than HRD and that HRD may be an accidental surrogate marker for tumor spread and concomitant cytoreduction efficiency. It remains to be determined whether this also applies for sensitivity to PARPi.
同源重组缺陷(HRD)已成为高级别卵巢癌(HGOC)的主要诊断标志物,可预测对聚(二磷酸腺苷 - 核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPi)以及铂类疗法的反应。除HRD外,腹膜肿瘤播散类型也会影响治疗反应和患者生存;粟粒型肿瘤播散的预后比非粟粒型肿瘤播散更差。
根据我们的技术要求对已知的HRD评估方法进行了调整,由此产生了用于HRD评估的预测价值综合基因组不稳定性评分(PIGIS)。PIGIS在122例患者的HGOC样本中得到验证。我们使用PIGIS分析肿瘤播散类型是否与HRD状态相关,以及这是否对生存有影响。
我们证明PIGIS能够区分HRD阳性和HRD阴性样本。粟粒型肿瘤播散的肿瘤为HRD阴性,预后非常差,无进展生存期(PFS)为15.6个月,总生存期(OS)为3.9年。然而,我们队列中HRD阴性的非粟粒型播散肿瘤预后要好得多(PFS 35.4个月,OS 8.9年);与HRD阳性肿瘤相似(PFS 34.7个月,OS 8.9年)。
我们的结果表明,在一个主要未接受过PARPi治疗的队列中,肿瘤播散类型和伴随的细胞减灭效率比HRD更能预测生存,并且HRD可能是肿瘤播散和伴随细胞减灭效率的一个偶然替代标志物。对于PARPi的敏感性是否也如此仍有待确定。