Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States of America.
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Dec;159(3):887-898. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.029. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
Homologous recombination DNA repair deficiency (HRD) is a functional defect in homologous recombination DNA repair, arising from germline or somatic mutations in BRCA1/2 or other mechanisms. Cells with HRD are more sensitive to platinum and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). HRD generates permanent changes in the genome with specific, quantifiable patterns ("genomic scars"). Clinical tests for HRD, such as the Myriad genomic instability score and Foundation Medicine loss of heterozygosity test, aim to predict the presence of HRD based on genomic features. Clinical trials of PARPi in ovarian cancer have evaluated genetic mutations and HRD genomic assays as potential biomarkers of response. Patients with HRD due to BRCA1/2 mutations are more likely to respond to PARPi than those with wild-type (WT) BRCA1/2. In some clinical trials, patients with WT BRCA1/2 who were predicted to be HRD by a genomic test exhibited greater clinical benefit from PARPi than patients with WT BRCA1/2 and no evidence of HRD. HRD tests therefore hold promise as predictive biomarkers for PARPi and other DNA-damaging agents. However, HRD tests vary in terms of the specific genomic features they measure, and the methods used to determine thresholds defining patients with HRD. Also, HRD test results and PARPi responses can be discordant: for instance, tumors with reversion mutations that restore HR function still exhibit a "genomic scar" of HRD, and PARPi resistance mechanisms independent of HR can result in lack of PARPi response despite HRD. Emerging methods to predict HRD, including genomic and functional assays, may overcome some of these challenges. Evaluation of HRD in the clinical setting is an important tool that has potential to aid patient selection for PARPi and other DNA-damaging agents in ovarian cancer, but understanding the details of these tests and their limitations is critical to ensure their optimal clinical application.
同源重组 DNA 修复缺陷 (HRD) 是同源重组 DNA 修复的功能缺陷,源于 BRCA1/2 种系或体细胞突变或其他机制。具有 HRD 的细胞对铂类和聚(ADP-核糖)聚合酶抑制剂 (PARPi) 更敏感。HRD 会导致基因组发生永久性变化,具有特定的、可量化的模式(“基因组痕迹”)。用于 HRD 的临床检测,如 Myriad 基因组不稳定性评分和 Foundation Medicine 杂合性缺失检测,旨在根据基因组特征预测 HRD 的存在。卵巢癌中 PARPi 的临床试验评估了遗传突变和 HRD 基因组检测作为反应的潜在生物标志物。由于 BRCA1/2 突变而具有 HRD 的患者比具有野生型 (WT) BRCA1/2 的患者更有可能对 PARPi 产生反应。在一些临床试验中,通过基因组检测预测为 HRD 的 WT BRCA1/2 患者比具有 WT BRCA1/2 且无 HRD 证据的患者从 PARPi 中获得更大的临床获益。因此,HRD 检测有望成为 PARPi 和其他 DNA 损伤剂的预测生物标志物。然而,HRD 检测在其测量的特定基因组特征以及用于确定定义 HRD 患者的阈值的方法方面存在差异。此外,HRD 检测结果和 PARPi 反应可能不一致:例如,具有恢复 HR 功能的回复突变的肿瘤仍然表现出 HRD 的“基因组痕迹”,并且 HR 独立的 PARPi 耐药机制可能导致尽管存在 HRD,但缺乏 PARPi 反应。预测 HRD 的新兴方法,包括基因组和功能检测,可能会克服其中一些挑战。在临床环境中评估 HRD 是一种重要的工具,有可能帮助选择卵巢癌患者使用 PARPi 和其他 DNA 损伤剂,但了解这些检测的细节及其局限性对于确保其最佳临床应用至关重要。