Matsukane Ryosuke, Oyama Takahiro, Tatsuta Ryosuke, Kimura Sakiko, Hata Kojiro, Urata Shuhei, Watanabe Hiroyuki
Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
Department of Pharmacy, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1 Honjo, Chuo-ku, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;16(11):2159. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112159.
With cancer diagnosis occurring at older ages, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has extended to older adults. However, the safety of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in this population remains unclear and relies on data extrapolated from younger adults. This multicenter retrospective study aimed to examine irAE prevalence and tolerability in older adults. We included 436 patients with non-small lung cancer undergoing ICI therapy and dichotomized them into two age groups (< or ≥75 years). Incidence of any irAE grade, grade ≥3 irAEs, and steroid usage after irAE occurrence was similar between younger (n = 332) and older groups (n = 104). While the younger patients with irAEs showed prolonged overall survival in the 12-month landmark Kaplan-Meier analysis (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.89, = 0.013), the older cohort did not (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.36-1.78, = 0.588). Although no differences were observed with ICI continuation or re-challenge after irAE onset, the elderly cohort had double the irAE cases that required a transition to best supportive care (BSC) (11.3% vs. 22.4%, = 0.026). In conclusion, although irAE prevalence remains consistent regardless of age, the increased conversion to BSC post-irAE onset in older adults suggests diminished tolerability and the potential absence of favorable prognosis associated with irAEs in this population.
随着癌症诊断年龄的增加,免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的使用已扩展到老年人。然而,这一人群中免疫相关不良事件(irAE)的安全性仍不明确,且依赖于从年轻人中推断的数据。这项多中心回顾性研究旨在检查老年人中irAE的患病率和耐受性。我们纳入了436例接受ICI治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者,并将他们分为两个年龄组(<75岁或≥75岁)。在年轻组(n = 332)和老年组(n = 104)之间,任何irAE分级、≥3级irAE的发生率以及irAE发生后的类固醇使用情况相似。在12个月的标志性Kaplan-Meier分析中,有irAE的年轻患者显示总生存期延长(风险比(HR)0.59,95%置信区间(CI)0.38 - 0.89,P = 0.013),而老年队列则没有(HR 0.80,95% CI 0.36 - 1.78,P = 0.588)。虽然在irAE发作后继续使用ICI或再次使用ICI方面未观察到差异,但老年队列中需要过渡到最佳支持治疗(BSC)的irAE病例数是年轻队列的两倍(11.3%对22.4%,P = 0.026)。总之,尽管无论年龄大小,irAE患病率保持一致,但老年患者irAE发作后转为BSC的比例增加,表明该人群耐受性降低,且与irAE相关的潜在良好预后可能不存在。