Zhang Chaofan, Zhang Zeyu, Lin Yunzhi, Xin Yishan, Li Hongyan, Lin Yiming, Huang Ying, Yang Ye, Bai Guochang, Huang Zida, Fang Xinyu, Li Wenbo, Zhang Wenming
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(8):1946-1954. doi: 10.1111/os.14137. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
The management of the infrapatellar fat pad (IPFP) during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate a novel IPFP preservation technique-"the medially pedicled IPFP flap"-for reducing postoperative pain, wound complications, and improving functional recovery after TKA.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on TKA cases at our institution from 2018 to 2021, including those with IPFP preservation (medially pedicled flap) versus IPFP complete resection. Patient demographics, perioperative parameters (blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analogue scale [VAS] score, white cell count [WBC], C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], and wound oozing), and postoperative follow-up data (VAS, Knee Society [KSS], or Knee Society functional assessment [KSFA] scores) were compared between groups. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare continuous data and chi-squared tests were used to compare categorical data between groups.
Six hundred thirty patients were included, with 278 in the medial pedicled IPFP flap group (preservation group) and 352 in the IPFP resection group (resection group). The operative time was significantly shorter in the preservation versus resection group (125.5 ± 23.2 vs 130.3 ± 28.7 mins, p = 0.03), as was the length of hospital stay (8.4 ± 2.7 vs 9.2 ± 2.3 days, p < 0.01). Regarding pain, the preservation group had significantly lower VAS scores on postoperative day 2 (2.0 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 1.2, p < 0.001) and day 3 (1.5 ± 0.5 vs 1.8 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). CRP and ESR levels on postoperative day 5 were also significantly lower in the preservation group. Wound oozing rates were significantly lower in the preservation versus resection group (0.7% vs 2.8%, p = 0.04). No significant differences existed in VAS, KSS, or KSFA scores at the last follow-up.
The novel IPFP preservation technique significantly improved surgical exposure, shortened operative time and length of hospital stay. It also reduced wound pain and oozing compared to IPFP resection.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)中髌下脂肪垫(IPFP)的处理仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估一种新型的IPFP保留技术——“内侧带蒂IPFP皮瓣”,以减轻TKA术后疼痛、伤口并发症并改善功能恢复。
对我院2018年至2021年的TKA病例进行回顾性分析,包括IPFP保留(内侧带蒂皮瓣)与IPFP完全切除的病例。比较两组患者的人口统计学资料、围手术期参数(失血量、手术时间、住院时间、视觉模拟评分[VAS]、白细胞计数[WBC]、C反应蛋白[CRP]、红细胞沉降率[ESR]和伤口渗血情况)以及术后随访数据(VAS、膝关节协会[KSS]或膝关节协会功能评估[KSFA]评分)。采用独立样本t检验比较连续数据,采用卡方检验比较组间分类数据。
共纳入630例患者,内侧带蒂IPFP皮瓣组(保留组)278例,IPFP切除组(切除组)352例。保留组的手术时间明显短于切除组(125.5±23.2对130.3±28.7分钟,p = 0.03),住院时间也较短(8.4±2.7对9.2±2.3天,p < 0.01)。在疼痛方面,保留组术后第2天(2.0±0.8对2.4±1.2,p < 0.001)和第3天(1.5±0.5对1.8±1.0,p < 0.001)的VAS评分明显更低。保留组术后第5天的CRP和ESR水平也明显更低。保留组的伤口渗血率明显低于切除组(0.7%对2.8%,p = 0.04)。末次随访时,VAS、KSS或KSFA评分无显著差异。
新型IPFP保留技术显著改善了手术视野,缩短了手术时间和住院时间。与IPFP切除相比,它还减轻了伤口疼痛和渗血。