G Priyadharshini, Ramalingam Karthikeyan, Ramani Pratibha, Krishnan Murugesan
Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2024 May 19;16(5):e60596. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60596. eCollection 2024 May.
Background Studies evaluating the quality of life (QoL) among oral cancer patients in the Indian population are scarce. Regular follow-ups and QoL assessment in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients can aid in comprehensive support strategies to improve their QoL outcomes. Aim and objectives This study aimed to assess the QoL of oral cancer patients and correlate the QoL with demographic and treatment parameters. Materials and methods The study included oral cancer patients who had previously reported to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. QoL assessment was done using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HN43 questionnaires before and after treatment. The clinico-demographic details, treatment data, follow-up data, and recorded mean QoL were procured from the patient records in Dental Information Archival Software. Assessment of QoL was done before treatment and at intervals of one month, three months, six months, 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months postoperatively after treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 23 (released 2015; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). A repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was utilized for comparing the average QoL scores and frequency of follow-ups across various intervals. Chi-square tests assessed differences in mean QoL among genders, across different sites, and between primary closure and graft placement. The significance was set at a p-value of less than 0.05. Results A total of 90 OSCC patients had reported to the department. A preoperative assessment of QoL was done for 90 (100%) patients. Out of these patients, surgery has been performed on 41 (45%). Twenty-five out of 41 (60%) patients had responded to regular follow-up, and QoL was assessed for these patients. After the immediate postoperative phase, only 12 (48%) had reported after three months. Only six (24%) had a 12-month follow-up, five (20%) had a two-year follow-up, and one (4%) had a three-year follow-up. There was a constant decrease in the number of follow-ups after the treatment of OSCC (p=0.00). Prior to treatment, the mean QoL index was 4.64. Females had a slightly higher preoperative QoL of 4.76 compared to males, with a score of 4.67 (p=0.157). Immediately after the treatment of OSCC, a decline in QoL scores was noted, with a mean score of 4.25 (p=0.32). Patients who underwent primary closure after excision had a mean post-op QoL score of 4.9, while patients who underwent graft placement had a mean score of 4.6 (p=0.157). Conclusion This study highlights the enduring impact of oral cancer on a patient's quality of life and emphasizes the need for ongoing research to explore specific interventions that can contribute to sustained improvement in QoL. It emphasizes personalized, holistic care approaches for such patients.
评估印度人群口腔癌患者生活质量(QoL)的研究很少。对口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)患者进行定期随访和生活质量评估有助于制定全面的支持策略,以改善他们的生活质量结果。目的:本研究旨在评估口腔癌患者的生活质量,并将生活质量与人口统计学和治疗参数相关联。材料与方法:本研究纳入了之前到口腔颌面外科就诊的口腔癌患者。在治疗前后使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)QLQ-C30和QLQ-HN43问卷进行生活质量评估。临床人口统计学细节、治疗数据、随访数据以及记录的平均生活质量数据均从牙科信息存档软件中的患者记录中获取。在治疗前以及治疗后术后1个月、3个月、6个月、12个月、24个月和36个月的间隔时间进行生活质量评估。使用IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows 23版(2015年发布;IBM公司,美国纽约州阿蒙克)进行统计分析。采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)比较不同时间间隔的平均生活质量得分和随访频率。卡方检验评估性别、不同部位以及一期缝合和植皮之间平均生活质量的差异。显著性设定为p值小于0.05。结果:共有90例OSCC患者到该科室就诊。对90例(100%)患者进行了术前生活质量评估。在这些患者中,41例(45%)接受了手术。41例患者中有25例(60%)对定期随访做出了回应,并对这些患者进行了生活质量评估。术后即刻阶段过后,三个月后只有12例(48%)进行了汇报。只有6例(24%)进行了12个月的随访,5例(20%)进行了两年的随访,1例(4%)进行了三年的随访。OSCC治疗后随访人数持续减少(p = 0.00)。治疗前,平均生活质量指数为4.64。女性术前平均生活质量略高于男性,分别为4.76和4.67(p = 0.157)。OSCC治疗后即刻,生活质量得分出现下降,平均分为4.25(p = 0.32)。切除术后进行一期缝合的患者术后平均生活质量得分为4.9,而接受植皮的患者平均得分为4.6(p = 0.157)。结论:本研究强调了口腔癌对患者生活质量的持久影响,并强调需要持续开展研究以探索有助于持续改善生活质量的具体干预措施。它强调对此类患者采用个性化、整体化的护理方法。