Jeon Minsoo, Oh Hyeri, Lim Hyosung, Yun Hyo Jun
Department of International Sport, Dankook University, Chungcheongnam-do, Republic of Korea.
Department of Physical Education, Korea National Sport University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Iran J Public Health. 2024 Feb;53(2):348-355. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v53i2.14919.
We developed a reference point by applying a doping attitude and propensity tool to prevent doping in sports athletes.
Performance Enhancement Attitude Scale (PEAS) was investigated on 768 registered athletes with the Korea Sports Association. Independent sample -test and ANOVA were applied to confirm the doping attitude and propensity according to anti-doping education and event type. To establish the criteria for PEAS, the intersection was confirmed through the group comparison method, and EasyOZ by Excel was applied at this time. In addition, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to confirm the validity of the reference point.
First, in the case of anti-doping education, it was confirmed that more than 90% of the anti-doping education was completed in all sports. Second, there was no statistically significant difference in PEAS according to the type of sport, and there was only a difference in the PEAS according to whether or not anti-doping education was provided and whether or not there was anti-doping education. Third, the point of contact established in the group comparison method was 29.5 points, and as a result of validating the validity based on this, 30 points were found to be the most suitable index.
This study could be used as important information in that it suggests a different method for evaluating PEAS and establishes a reference point that can be used more effectively in the actual field.
我们通过应用一种兴奋剂态度和倾向工具来为预防运动员使用兴奋剂建立一个参考点。
对韩国体育协会注册的768名运动员进行了增强运动表现态度量表(PEAS)调查。应用独立样本检验和方差分析,以根据反兴奋剂教育和赛事类型确认兴奋剂态度和倾向。为了确定PEAS的标准,通过组间比较法确认交叉点,此时应用Excel中的EasyOZ。此外,计算准确性、敏感性和特异性以确认参考点的有效性。
第一,在反兴奋剂教育方面,确认所有体育项目中超过90%的运动员完成了反兴奋剂教育。第二,根据运动项目类型,PEAS没有统计学上的显著差异,仅根据是否接受反兴奋剂教育以及是否有反兴奋剂教育,PEAS存在差异。第三,组间比较法确定的交叉点为29.5分,基于此验证有效性的结果发现,30分是最合适的指标。
本研究可作为重要信息,因为它提出了一种评估PEAS的不同方法,并建立了一个能在实际领域更有效使用的参考点。