• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Pump as Adjunct to Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy against Decongestive Therapy Alone for Upper Limb Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.间歇性气动压迫泵辅助消肿性淋巴治疗与单纯消肿性治疗对乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿疗效的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Breast Care (Basel). 2024 Jun;19(3):155-164. doi: 10.1159/000538940. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
2
Decongestive lymphatic therapy for patients with breast carcinoma-associated lymphedema. A randomized, prospective study of a role for adjunctive intermittent pneumatic compression.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者的消肿性淋巴治疗。辅助间歇性气动压迫作用的随机前瞻性研究。
Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2260-7. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10976.
3
Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 21;2015(5):CD003475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression on breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis in clinical studies.间歇性气动压迫对乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿的疗效:临床研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Gland Surg. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1358-1369. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-123. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
6
Physical therapies in the decongestive treatment of lymphedema: A randomized, non-inferiority controlled study.物理疗法在淋巴水肿消肿治疗中的应用:一项随机、非劣效性对照研究。
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Dec;35(12):1743-1756. doi: 10.1177/02692155211032651. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
7
The efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression as a substitute for manual lymphatic drainage in complete decongestive therapy in the treatment of breast cancer related lymphedema.间歇气动压迫作为完整消肿治疗中手动淋巴引流替代方法在治疗乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿中的疗效。
Lymphology. 2019;52(2):82-91.
8
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression for the Treatment of Lower Limb Lymphedema: A Pilot Trial of Sequencing to Mimic Manual Lymphatic Drainage Versus Traditional Graduated Sequential Compression.间歇性气动压迫治疗下肢淋巴水肿:模仿手动淋巴引流与传统分级序贯压迫的序贯治疗初步试验。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2022 Oct;20(5):514-521. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0025. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
9
Factors Predicting Limb Volume Reduction Using Compression Bandaging Within Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy in Lymphedema: A Multicountry Prospective Study.使用加压包扎法在淋巴水肿的消肿治疗中预测肢体体积减少的因素:一项多国前瞻性研究。
Lymphat Res Biol. 2021 Oct;19(5):412-422. doi: 10.1089/lrb.2021.0060.
10
Current Role of Pneumatic Compression Therapy in Lymphedema Care: A Scoping Review of Persistent Debates and New Applications.气压治疗在淋巴水肿护理中的当前作用:对持续争论和新应用的范围综述
Lymphology. 2024;57(3):142-156.

引用本文的文献

1
Educational Review: Management of Lymphedema-Approaches, Evidence for Surgical and Nonsurgical Interventions.教育综述:淋巴水肿的管理——手术及非手术干预方法与证据
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May 20. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17463-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast Cancer-Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Prognostic Markers, and Current Treatment Strategies-An Updated Review.乳腺癌——流行病学、危险因素、分类、预后标志物及当前治疗策略——最新综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;13(17):4287. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174287.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Surgical management of lymphedema: a review of current literature.淋巴水肿的外科治疗:当前文献综述
Gland Surg. 2020 Apr;9(2):503-511. doi: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.14.
4
Role of intermittent pneumatic compression in the treatment of breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a randomized controlled trial.间歇性气动压迫在治疗乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿中的作用:一项随机对照试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2020 Feb;34(2):220-228. doi: 10.1177/0269215519888792. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
5
The efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression as a substitute for manual lymphatic drainage in complete decongestive therapy in the treatment of breast cancer related lymphedema.间歇气动压迫作为完整消肿治疗中手动淋巴引流替代方法在治疗乳腺癌相关性淋巴水肿中的疗效。
Lymphology. 2019;52(2):82-91.
6
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
7
Long-Term Effects of Breast Cancer Surgery, Treatment, and Survivor Care.乳腺癌手术、治疗和生存者护理的长期影响。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019 Nov;64(6):713-724. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13012. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
8
Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 21;2015(5):CD003475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2.
9
Breast cancer-related lymphedema: Symptoms, diagnosis, risk reduction, and management.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿:症状、诊断、风险降低及管理
World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 10;5(3):241-7. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i3.241.
10
Intermittent pneumatic compression pump for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.间歇气动加压泵治疗乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oncol Res Treat. 2014;37(4):170-4. doi: 10.1159/000360786. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

间歇性气动压迫泵辅助消肿性淋巴治疗与单纯消肿性治疗对乳腺癌术后上肢淋巴水肿疗效的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Comparison of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Pump as Adjunct to Decongestive Lymphatic Therapy against Decongestive Therapy Alone for Upper Limb Lymphedema after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Yao Min, Peng Puchao, Ding Xiufang, Sun Qinfang, Chen Lijie

机构信息

Department of Breast Surgery, Huzhou Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, Huzhou, China.

出版信息

Breast Care (Basel). 2024 Jun;19(3):155-164. doi: 10.1159/000538940. Epub 2024 Apr 22.

DOI:10.1159/000538940
PMID:38894955
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11182636/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is among the most prevalent malignancies in women worldwide, with substantial morbidity and mortality. Upper limb lymphedema (ULL) is a common complication after breast cancer surgery that affects patients' daily activities and quality of life. Decongestive lymphatic therapy (DLT) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) therapy are 2 primary treatment methods for ULL.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of DLT with IPC versus DLT alone in the management of ULL following breast cancer surgery.

METHOD

PubMed Central, SCOPUS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Trial Registry, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DLT with IPC and DLT alone in patients with breast cancer-related ULL. The risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB 2 tool. Pooled effect sizes were calculated using random-effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 1,894 citations were identified by the systematic search. Of them, 9 RCTs were included in the analysis. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for percentage volume reduction was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.24 to 1.50; = 90.9%), showing no significant difference between the DLT alone and DLT combined with IPC ( = 0.15). Pain and heaviness scores were also comparable between the groups. However, there was a significant difference in external rotation joint mobility (SMD = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.08-1.16; = 23.8%), favoring DLT with IPC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that DLT with IPC and DLT alone showed similar findings in managing ULL after breast cancer surgery, with DLT with IPC showing a greater impact on external rotation joint mobility. Healthcare providers should consider patient preferences and individual factors when selecting the most appropriate treatment modality for ULL management.

摘要

背景

乳腺癌是全球女性中最常见的恶性肿瘤之一,具有较高的发病率和死亡率。上肢淋巴水肿(ULL)是乳腺癌手术后的常见并发症,会影响患者的日常活动和生活质量。消肿淋巴治疗(DLT)和间歇性气动压迫(IPC)治疗是ULL的两种主要治疗方法。

目的

本研究旨在比较DLT联合IPC与单纯DLT治疗乳腺癌术后ULL的疗效。

方法

全面检索PubMed Central、SCOPUS、EMBASE、MEDLINE、Cochrane试验注册库、谷歌学术和Clinicaltrials.gov数据库,以查找比较DLT联合IPC与单纯DLT治疗乳腺癌相关ULL患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用RoB 2工具评估偏倚风险。采用随机效应模型计算合并效应量。

结果

通过系统检索共识别出1894条引文。其中,9项RCT纳入分析。体积减少百分比的合并标准化均值差(SMD)为0.63(95%置信区间[CI]:-0.24至1.50;I² = 90.9%),表明单纯DLT与DLT联合IPC之间无显著差异(P = 0.15)。两组间疼痛和沉重感评分也相当。然而,在外旋关节活动度方面存在显著差异(SMD = 0.62;95%CI:0.08 - 1.16;I² = 23.8%),DLT联合IPC更具优势。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,DLT联合IPC与单纯DLT在治疗乳腺癌术后ULL方面效果相似,DLT联合IPC在外旋关节活动度方面影响更大。医疗服务提供者在选择ULL管理的最合适治疗方式时应考虑患者偏好和个体因素。