Suppr超能文献

面向临床医生、护理人员和患者的骨髓增生异常综合征治疗偏好问卷的编制

Development of the treatment preference in myelodysplasia questionnaire for clinicians, carers, and patients.

作者信息

Morlock Robert, Fong Chun, Castaldi Francesco, Paine Taliesha, Collett Donna, Enjeti Anoop

机构信息

Health Services Research YourCareChoice Ann Arbor Michigan USA.

Department of Clinical Haematology Austin Health Heidelberg Australia.

出版信息

EJHaem. 2024 May 28;5(3):535-540. doi: 10.1002/jha2.930. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

This study reports the development activities for the Treatment Preference Myelodysplasia Questionnaires (TPMQ) for clinicians (mTPMQ), carers (cTPMQ), and patients (pTPMQ). These tools are intended to evaluate treatment preferences for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). This was a non-interventional, cross-sectional qualitative interview study consisting of interviews with clinicians, patients, and those caring for patients with MDS. All participants were located in Australia and data were collected from qualitative mixed-method interviews composed of concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing related to initial drafts of the questionnaires. Fifteen individuals participated in interviews (five from each group). Based on the concept elicitation portion of interviews, concepts of importance were classified and reasons for treatment preference were documented. From cognitive debriefing, the questionnaires were generally deemed to be clear and easy to understand. Participant input from both concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing portions was used to revise initial drafts of the questionnaires. The mTPMQ, cTPMQ, and pTPMQ were developed with direct input from clinicians, patients, and caregivers to assess the key concepts of interest related to the preference for the treatment of MDS and are ready to be used and evaluated further in clinical trials.

摘要

本研究报告了针对临床医生(mTPMQ)、护理人员(cTPMQ)和患者(pTPMQ)的骨髓增生异常综合征治疗偏好问卷(TPMQ)的开发活动。这些工具旨在评估骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者的治疗偏好。这是一项非干预性横断面定性访谈研究,包括对临床医生、患者以及MDS患者护理人员的访谈。所有参与者均位于澳大利亚,数据收集自定性混合方法访谈,这些访谈由与问卷初稿相关的概念引出和认知反馈组成。15人参与了访谈(每组5人)。根据访谈的概念引出部分,对重要概念进行了分类,并记录了治疗偏好的原因。从认知反馈来看,问卷总体上被认为清晰易懂。来自概念引出和认知反馈部分的参与者意见被用于修订问卷初稿。mTPMQ、cTPMQ和pTPMQ是在临床医生、患者和护理人员的直接参与下开发的,以评估与MDS治疗偏好相关的关键感兴趣概念,并且已准备好在临床试验中进一步使用和评估。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验