Suppr超能文献

测试集结果可预测参与者在乳腺癌筛查检测中的进展:一项观察性队列研究。

Test-set results can predict participants' development in breast-screen cancer detection: An observational cohort study.

作者信息

Qenam Basel A, Li Tong, Alshabibi Abdulaziz, Frazer Helen, Ekpo Ernest, Brennan Patrick

机构信息

Medical Image Optimisation and Perception Group, Discipline of Medical Imaging Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney Camperdown New South Wales Australia.

Department of Radiological Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Health Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 17;7(6):e2161. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.2161. eCollection 2024 Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Test-sets are standardized assessments used to evaluate reader performance in breast screening. Understanding how test-set results affect real-world performance can help refine their use as a quality improvement tool. The aim of this study is to explore if mammographic test-set results could identify breast-screening readers who improved their cancer detection in association with test-set training.

METHODS

Test-set results of 41 participants were linked to their annual cancer detection rate change in two periods oriented around their first test-set participation year. Correlation tests and a multiple linear regression model investigated the relationship between each metric in the test-set results and the change in detection rates. Additionally, participants were divided based on their improvement status between the two periods, and Mann-Whitney test was used to determine if the subgroups differed in their test-set metrics.

RESULTS

Test-set records indicated multiple significant correlations with the change in breast cancer detection rate: a moderate positive correlation with sensitivity (0.688,  < 0.001), a moderate negative correlation with specificity (-0.528,  < 0.001), and a low to moderate positive correlation with lesion sensitivity (0.469,  = 0.002), and the number of years screen-reading mammograms (0.365,  = 0.02). In addition, the overall regression was statistically significant ( (2,38) = 18.456  < 0.001), with an ² of 0.493 (adjusted ² = 0.466) based on sensitivity ( = 27.132,  < 0.001) and specificity ( = 9.78,  = 0.003). Subgrouping the cohort based on the change in cancer detection indicated that the improved group is significantly higher in sensitivity ( < 0.001) and lesion sensitivity ( = 0.02) but lower in specificity ( = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Sensitivity and specificity are the strongest test-set performance measures to predict the change in breast cancer detection in real-world breast screening settings following test-set participation.

摘要

背景与目的

测试集是用于评估乳腺筛查中阅片者表现的标准化评估方法。了解测试集结果如何影响实际表现有助于优化其作为质量改进工具的用途。本研究的目的是探讨乳腺钼靶测试集结果能否识别出在接受测试集培训后提高了癌症检出率的乳腺筛查阅片者。

方法

41名参与者的测试集结果与他们在以首次参与测试集年份为中心的两个时期内的年度癌症检出率变化相关联。相关性测试和多元线性回归模型研究了测试集结果中的每个指标与检出率变化之间的关系。此外,根据参与者在两个时期之间的改善状况进行分组,并使用曼-惠特尼检验来确定各亚组在测试集指标上是否存在差异。

结果

测试集记录显示与乳腺癌检出率变化存在多个显著相关性:与敏感度呈中度正相关(0.688,<0.001),与特异度呈中度负相关(-0.528,<0.001),与病灶敏感度呈低至中度正相关(0.469,=0.002),以及与乳腺钼靶阅片年限呈正相关(0.365,=0.02)。此外,总体回归具有统计学意义((2,38)=18.456 <0.001),基于敏感度(=27.132,<0.001)和特异度(=9.78,=0.003),决定系数为0.493(调整后=0.466)。根据癌症检出率变化对队列进行亚组分析表明,改善组在敏感度(<0.001)和病灶敏感度(=0.02)方面显著更高,但在特异度方面更低(=0.003)。

结论

敏感度和特异度是预测在参与测试集后实际乳腺筛查环境中乳腺癌检出率变化的最强测试集表现指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1095/11183186/2c6a09c8d827/HSR2-7-e2161-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验