• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Testing the Validity and Reliability of a Standardized Virtual Examination for Concussion.测试一种标准化脑震荡虚拟检查的有效性和可靠性。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Oct;14(5):e200328. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200328. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
Is a Three-component Video-based Version of the Foot Posture Index Valid for Assessing Pediatric Patients With Orthopaedic and Neurologic Foot Conditions?足部姿势指数的三组件视频版本是否可用于评估患有骨科和神经足部疾病的儿科患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):2063-2071. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003110. Epub 2024 May 9.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Head impulse, nystagmus, and test of skew examination for diagnosing central causes of acute vestibular syndrome.头部脉冲测试、眼震测试和斜视角检查用于诊断急性前庭综合征的中枢性病因。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 2;11(11):CD015089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015089.pub2.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
8
Telehealth interventions: remote monitoring and consultations for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).远程医疗干预:针对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的远程监测和咨询。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 20;7(7):CD013196. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013196.pub2.
9
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.痴呆症的回忆疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.
10
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Professionals Evaluating Clients' Suitability for Digital Health and Social Care: Scoping Review of Assessment Instruments.专业人员评估客户使用数字健康和社会护理的适宜性:评估工具的范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 30;25:e51450. doi: 10.2196/51450.
2
Comparison of Live and Remote Video Ratings of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia.共济失调评估与评分量表的现场与远程视频评分比较
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023 Aug 7;10(9):1404-1407. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.13843. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Patient Travel Distance to Neurologist Visits.患者前往神经科医生处就诊的行程距离。
Neurology. 2023 Oct 31;101(18):e1807-e1820. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207810. Epub 2023 Sep 13.
4
A Comparison of Patients' and Neurologists' Assessments of their Teleneurology Encounter: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.患者与神经科医生对远程神经科会诊评估的比较:横断面分析
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Mar;30(3):841-849. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0168. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
5
Study to Assess Content Validity and Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Inclusion Body Myositis Functional Rating Scale.评估包涵体肌炎功能评定量表的内容效度、评分者间信度和评分者内信度的研究。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Aug;13(4):e200168. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200168. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
6
Sport concussion assessment tool™ - 6 (SCAT6).运动性脑震荡评估工具™-6(SCAT6)。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Jun;57(11):622-631. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107036.
7
The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Diagnostic Criteria for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.美国康复医学会轻度创伤性脑损伤的诊断标准。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Aug;104(8):1343-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.036. Epub 2023 May 19.
8
Sociodemographic and Geographic Variation in Access to Neuro-Ophthalmologists in the United States.美国神经眼科医生可及性的社会人口统计学和地理差异。
J Neuroophthalmol. 2023 Jun 1;43(2):149-152. doi: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001821. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
9
Inter-rater Reliability of the Revised Physical and Neurological Examination of Subtle Signs (PANESS) scored using video review.使用视频回顾对修订后的细微体征的物理和神经检查(PANESS)进行评分的观察者间可靠性。
Child Neuropsychol. 2023 Aug;29(6):922-933. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2022.2140797. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
10
MICK (Mobile Integrated Cognitive Kit) app: Feasibility of an accessible tablet-based rapid picture and number naming task for concussion assessment in a division 1 college football cohort.MICK(移动集成认知工具包)应用程序:一种基于平板电脑的无障碍快速图片和数字命名任务在一级大学橄榄球队列脑震荡评估中的可行性。
J Neurol Sci. 2022 Nov 15;442:120445. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2022.120445. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

测试一种标准化脑震荡虚拟检查的有效性和可靠性。

Testing the Validity and Reliability of a Standardized Virtual Examination for Concussion.

作者信息

Jack Alani I, Digney Helena T, Bell Carter A, Grossman Scott N, McPherson Jacob I, Saleem Ghazala T, Haider Mohammad N, Leddy John J, Willer Barry S, Balcer Laura J, Galetta Steven L, Busis Neil A, Torres Daniel M

机构信息

Department of Neurology (AIJ, HTD, CAB, SNG, LJB, SLG, NAB), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NY; Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (JIM, GTS), School of Public Health and Health Professions, State University of New York at Buffalo; UBMD Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine (MNH, JJL) and Department of Psychiatry (BSW), Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo; Departments of Population Health (LJB) and Ophthalmology (LJB, SLG), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NY; and Department of Neurology (DMT), Lenox Hill Hospital at Northwell Health, New York, NY.

出版信息

Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Oct;14(5):e200328. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200328. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200328
PMID:38895642
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11182663/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We determined inter-modality (in-person vs telemedicine examination) and inter-rater agreement for telemedicine assessments (2 different examiners) using the Telemedicine Buffalo Concussion Physical Examination (Tele-BCPE), a standardized concussion examination designed for remote use.

METHODS

Patients referred for an initial evaluation for concussion were invited to participate. Participants had a brief initial assessment by the treating neurologist. After a patient granted informed consent to participate in the study, the treating neurologist obtained a concussion-related history before leaving the examination room. Using the Tele-BCPE, 2 virtual examinations in no specific sequence were then performed from nearby rooms by the treating neurologist and another neurologist. After the 2 telemedicine examinations, the treating physician returned to the examination room to perform the in-person examination. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) determined inter-modality validity (in-person vs remote examination by the same examiner) and inter-rater reliability (between remote examinations done by 2 examiners) of overall scores of the Tele-BCPE within the comparison datasets. Cohen's kappa, κ, measured levels of agreement of dichotomous ratings (abnormality present vs absent) on individual components of the Tele-BCPE to determine inter-modality and inter-rater agreement.

RESULTS

For total scores of the Tele-BCPE, both inter-modality agreement (ICC = 0.95 [95% CI 0.86-0.98, < 0.001]) and inter-rater agreement (ICC = 0.88 [95% CI 0.71-0.95, < 0.001]) were reliable (ICC >0.70). There was at least substantial inter-modality agreement (κ ≥ 0.61) for 25 of 29 examination elements. For inter-rater agreement (2 telemedicine examinations), there was at least substantial agreement for 8 of 29 examination elements.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrates that the Tele-BCPE yielded consistent clinical results, whether conducted in-person or virtually by the same examiner, or when performed virtually by 2 different examiners. The Tele-BCPE is a valid indicator of neurologic examination findings as determined by an in-person concussion assessment. The Tele-BCPE may also be performed with excellent levels of reliability by neurologists with different training and backgrounds in the virtual setting. These findings suggest that a combination of in-person and telemedicine modalities, or involvement of 2 telemedicine examiners for the same patient, can provide consistent concussion assessments across the continuum of care.

摘要

背景与目的

我们使用布法罗脑震荡远程体格检查(Tele-BCPE)(一种专为远程使用设计的标准化脑震荡检查),确定了远程医疗评估(2名不同检查者)的不同检查方式(面对面检查与远程医疗检查)之间以及检查者之间的一致性。

方法

邀请因脑震荡接受初次评估的患者参与。参与者由主治神经科医生进行简短的初步评估。在患者签署知情同意书参与研究后,主治神经科医生在离开检查室前获取与脑震荡相关的病史。然后,主治神经科医生和另一位神经科医生从附近房间按照无特定顺序进行2次虚拟检查,使用Tele-BCPE。2次远程医疗检查后,主治医生返回检查室进行面对面检查。组内相关系数(ICC)确定了比较数据集中Tele-BCPE总分的不同检查方式有效性(同一检查者的面对面检查与远程检查)和检查者间可靠性(2名检查者进行的远程检查之间)。Cohen's kappa(κ)测量了Tele-BCPE各个组成部分二分法评分(存在异常与不存在异常)的一致性水平,以确定不同检查方式和检查者间的一致性。

结果

对于Tele-BCPE的总分,不同检查方式的一致性(ICC = 0.95 [95% CI 0.86 - 0.98,< 0.001])和检查者间的一致性(ICC = 0.88 [95% CI 0.71 - 0.95,< 0.001])均可靠(ICC > 0.70)。29项检查要素中的25项存在至少高度的不同检查方式一致性(κ ≥ 0.61)。对于检查者间的一致性(2次远程医疗检查),29项检查要素中的8项存在至少高度一致性。

讨论

我们的研究表明,无论由同一检查者进行面对面检查还是虚拟检查,或者由2名不同检查者进行虚拟检查,Tele-BCPE都能产生一致的临床结果。Tele-BCPE是面对面脑震荡评估所确定的神经学检查结果的有效指标。在虚拟环境中,不同培训背景的神经科医生也能以极高的可靠性进行Tele-BCPE检查。这些发现表明,面对面检查和远程医疗检查方式相结合,或者由2名远程医疗检查者对同一患者进行检查,能够在整个连续护理过程中提供一致的脑震荡评估。