Yang Guangming, Guo Liyun, Zhang Yuan, Li Shan
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, China.
Front Neurol. 2024 Jun 4;15:1327065. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1327065. eCollection 2024.
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions in improving cognitive function in patients with ischemic stroke through network meta-analysis.
We searched databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EmBase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on non-pharmacological treatments to improve cognitive impairment following ischemic stroke. The publication date was up to 15 March 2023. Due to the insufficiency of included studies, supplementary searches for high-quality Chinese literature were performed in databases such as CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP Chinese Science Journals Database. Two reviewers independently went through the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies using the risk of bias assessment tool recommended by the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0. By utilizing R 4.2.3 RStudio software and the GeMTC package, a Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to assess the improvement in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores under a variety of non-pharmacological interventions.
A total of 22 RCTs involving 2,111 patients and 14 different non-pharmacological treatments were included. These interventions were transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), reminiscence therapy (RT), remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), physical fitness training (PFT), intensive patient care program (IPCP), moderate-intensity continuous training + high-intensity interval training (MICT + HIIT), medium intensity continuous training (MICT), grip training (GT), acupuncture, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), cognitive rehabilitation training (CRT), high pressure oxygen (HPO), moxibustion, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The results of the network meta-analysis indicated that rTMS had the highest likelihood of being the most effective intervention for improving MMSE and MoCA scores.
The evidence from this study suggests that rTMS holds promise for improving MMSE and MoCA scores in patients with cognitive impairment following ischemic stroke. However, further high-quality research is needed to confirm and validate this finding.
本研究旨在通过网络荟萃分析评估非药物干预措施对改善缺血性脑卒中患者认知功能的有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、EmBase和Web of Science等数据库,以查找关于改善缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍的非药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。截至2023年3月15日。由于纳入研究不足,在CNKI、万方数据和维普中文科技期刊数据库等数据库中进行了高质量中文文献的补充检索。两名评审员独立查阅文献、提取数据,并使用Cochrane系统评价干预措施手册5.1.0推荐的偏倚风险评估工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。利用R 4.2.3 RStudio软件和GeMTC软件包进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析,以评估在各种非药物干预措施下简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)得分的改善情况。
共纳入22项RCT,涉及2111例患者和14种不同的非药物治疗方法。这些干预措施包括经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、回忆疗法(RT)、远程缺血预处理(RIC)、体能训练(PFT)、强化患者护理计划(IPCP)、中等强度持续训练+高强度间歇训练(MICT+HIIT)、中等强度持续训练(MICT)、握力训练(GT)、针灸、认知行为疗法(CBT)、认知康复训练(CRT)、高压氧(HPO)、艾灸和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)。网络荟萃分析结果表明,rTMS最有可能是改善MMSE和MoCA得分的最有效干预措施。
本研究证据表明,rTMS有望改善缺血性脑卒中后认知障碍患者的MMSE和MoCA得分。然而,需要进一步的高质量研究来证实和验证这一发现。