Suppr超能文献

人工智能与贝叶斯决策理论在化学致癌物预测中的应用

Artificial intelligence and Bayesian decision theory in the prediction of chemical carcinogens.

作者信息

Rosenkranz H S, Mitchell C S, Klopman G

出版信息

Mutat Res. 1985 Jun-Jul;150(1-2):1-11. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(85)90095-8.

Abstract

Two procedures for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemicals are described. One of these (CASE) is a self-learning artificial intelligence system that automatically recognizes activating and/or deactivating structural subunits of candidate chemicals and uses this to determine the probability that the test chemical is or is not a carcinogen. If the chemical is predicted to be carcinogen, CASE also projects its probable potency. The second procedure (CPBS) uses Bayesian decision theory to predict the potential carcinogenicity of chemicals based upon the results of batteries of short-term assays. CPBS is useful even if the test results are mixed (i.e. both positive and negative responses are obtained in different genotoxic assays). CPBS can also be used to identify highly predictive as well as cost-effective batteries of assays. For illustrative purposes the ability of CASE and CPBS to predict the carcinogenicity of a carcinogenic and a non-carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon is shown. The potential for using the two methods in tandem to increase reliability and decrease cost is presented.

摘要

本文描述了两种预测化学物质致癌性的方法。其中一种方法(CASE)是一种自学习人工智能系统,它能自动识别候选化学物质的活化和/或钝化结构亚基,并以此来确定测试化学物质是致癌物或不是致癌物的概率。如果预测该化学物质为致癌物,CASE还会预测其可能的效力。第二种方法(CPBS)使用贝叶斯决策理论,根据一系列短期试验的结果来预测化学物质的潜在致癌性。即使测试结果参差不齐(即在不同的遗传毒性试验中获得了阳性和阴性反应),CPBS也很有用。CPBS还可用于识别具有高度预测性且经济高效的试验组合。为了说明目的,展示了CASE和CPBS预测一种致癌和一种非致癌多环芳烃致癌性的能力。还介绍了串联使用这两种方法以提高可靠性和降低成本的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验