Suppr超能文献

GAPS 二期:全球儿科外科学评估的制定和试点结果,这是一种针对资源匮乏环境的基于证据的儿科外科学能力评估工具。

GAPS phase II: development and pilot results of the global assessment in pediatric surgery, an evidence-based pediatric surgical capacity assessment tool for low-resource settings.

机构信息

Joe di Maggio Children's Hospital, 1150 N 35 Ave, Suite 555, Hollywood, FL, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2024 Jun 19;40(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s00383-024-05741-w.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pediatric surgical care in low- and middle-income countries is often hindered by systemic gaps in healthcare resources, infrastructure, training, and organization. This study aims to develop and validate the Global Assessment of Pediatric Surgery (GAPS) to appraise pediatric surgical capacity and discriminate between levels of care across diverse healthcare settings.

METHODS

The GAPS Version 1 was constructed through a synthesis of existing assessment tools and expert panel consultation. The resultant GAPS Version 2 underwent international pilot testing. Construct validation categorized institutions into providing basic or advanced surgical care. GAPS was further refined to Version 3 to include only questions with a > 75% response rate and those that significantly discriminated between basic or advanced surgical settings.

RESULTS

GAPS Version 1 included 139 items, which, after expert panel feedback, was expanded to 168 items in Version 2. Pilot testing, in 65 institutions, yielded a high response rate. Of the 168 questions in GAPS Version 2, 64 significantly discriminated between basic and advanced surgical care. The refined GAPS Version 3 tool comprises 64 questions on: human resources (9), material resources (39), outcomes (3), accessibility (3), and education (10).

CONCLUSION

The GAPS Version 3 tool presents a validated instrument for evaluating pediatric surgical capabilities in low-resource settings.

摘要

目的

在中低收入国家,儿科外科护理常常受到医疗资源、基础设施、培训和组织等方面系统差距的阻碍。本研究旨在开发和验证全球儿科外科学评估(GAPS),以评估儿科外科能力,并在不同医疗环境下区分护理水平。

方法

GAPS 版本 1 通过综合现有评估工具和专家小组咨询构建而成。由此产生的 GAPS 版本 2 进行了国际试点测试。结构验证将机构分为提供基本或高级外科护理的机构。GAPS 进一步细化为版本 3,仅包括响应率超过 75%的问题和那些能够显著区分基本和高级外科环境的问题。

结果

GAPS 版本 1 包含 139 个项目,经过专家小组的反馈,在版本 2 中扩展到 168 个项目。在 65 家机构进行的试点测试中,响应率很高。在 GAPS 版本 2 的 168 个问题中,有 64 个问题显著区分了基本和高级外科护理。经过精炼的 GAPS 版本 3 工具包括 64 个问题:人力资源(9)、物质资源(39)、结果(3)、可及性(3)和教育(10)。

结论

GAPS 版本 3 工具提供了一种经过验证的评估资源匮乏环境中儿科外科能力的工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验