• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与机器人辅助微创食管切除术胸内操作难度相关的解剖因素。

Anatomical factor associated with thoracic procedural difficulty in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 19;409(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03378-w.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-024-03378-w
PMID:38896339
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic surgical systems with full articulation of instruments, tremor filtering, and motion scaling can potentially overcome the procedural difficulties in endoscopic surgeries. However, whether robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) can overcome anatomical difficulties during thoracoscopic esophagectomy remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the anatomical and clinical factors that influence the difficulty of RAMIE in the thoracic region.

METHODS

Forty-five patients who underwent curative-intent RAMIE with upper mediastinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer were included. Using preoperative computed tomography images, we calculated previously reported anatomical indices to assess the upper mediastinal narrowness and vertebral body projections in the middle thoracic region. The factors influencing thoracic operative time were then investigated.

RESULTS

During the thoracic procedure, the median operative time was 215 (124-367) min and the median blood loss was 20 (5-190) mL. Postoperatively, pneumonia, anastomotic leakage, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy occurred in 17.8%, 2.2%, and 6.7% of the patients, respectively. The multiple linear regression model revealed that a narrow upper mediastinum and greater blood loss during the thoracic procedure were significant factors associated with a prolonged thoracic operative time (P = 0.025 and P < 0.001, respectively). Upper mediastinal narrowing was not associated with postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

A narrow upper mediastinum was significantly associated with a prolonged thoracic operative time in patients with RAMIE.

摘要

背景

具有器械全关节运动、震颤过滤和运动缩放功能的机器人手术系统可能能够克服内窥镜手术中的操作困难。然而,机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)是否能够克服胸腔镜食管切除术中的解剖困难尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明影响 RAMIE 在胸部区域难度的解剖和临床因素。

方法

纳入 45 例接受根治性 RAMIE 联合上纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗食管癌的患者。使用术前计算机断层扫描图像,我们计算了先前报道的解剖指标,以评估中上纵隔的上纵隔狭窄和椎体投影。然后研究了影响胸腔手术时间的因素。

结果

在胸腔手术过程中,中位手术时间为 215(124-367)分钟,中位出血量为 20(5-190)毫升。术后,17.8%的患者发生肺炎,2.2%的患者发生吻合口漏,6.7%的患者发生喉返神经麻痹。多元线性回归模型显示,狭窄的上纵隔和胸腔手术过程中更多的出血量是与胸腔手术时间延长相关的显著因素(P=0.025 和 P<0.001)。上纵隔狭窄与术后并发症无关。

结论

在 RAMIE 患者中,狭窄的上纵隔与胸腔手术时间延长显著相关。

相似文献

1
Anatomical factor associated with thoracic procedural difficulty in robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.与机器人辅助微创食管切除术胸内操作难度相关的解剖因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jun 19;409(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03378-w.
2
Factors influencing difficulty of the thoracic procedure in minimally invasive esophagectomy.影响微创食管切除术胸段手术难度的因素。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4279-85. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4743-3. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
3
Short-term outcomes of robotic radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer by a nontransthoracic approach compared with conventional transthoracic surgery.非开胸入路机器人根治性食管癌切除术与传统开胸手术相比的短期疗效
Dis Esophagus. 2016 Jul;29(5):429-34. doi: 10.1111/dote.12345. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
4
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 18,187 patients.机器人辅助与传统微创食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:18187 例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Mar 16;18(1):125. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01880-3.
5
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for resectable esophageal adenocarcinoma, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT-2 trial).机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与微创食管切除术治疗可切除食管腺癌的随机对照试验(ROBOT-2 试验)。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1060. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08780-x.
6
Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.机器人辅助微创食管切除术在治疗食管鳞癌方面真的比电视辅助微创食管切除术具有淋巴结清扫优势吗?基于短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2019 Jul 1;32(7). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy110.
7
Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer compared with video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: A single-center retrospective study.机器人辅助微创食管癌根治术与电视辅助微创食管癌根治术治疗食管癌的短期疗效比较:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Apr;15(2):270-278. doi: 10.1111/ases.12992. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Comparison of short-term outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy and video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating middle thoracic esophageal cancer.机器人辅助微创食管切除术与电视辅助微创食管切除术治疗胸段中段食管癌的短期疗效比较。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Aug 1;31(8). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy012.
9
Initial introduction of robot-assisted, minimally invasive esophagectomy using the microanatomy-based concept in the upper mediastinum.机器人辅助微创食管切除术的初步介绍,采用基于中上纵隔显微解剖学的概念。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6568-6576. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08154-7. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
10
Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-thoracoscopic technique. Systematic review and meta-analysis.微创 Ivor Lewis 食管切除术:机器人辅助与腹腔镜-胸腔镜技术。系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1692-1701. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 11.