Gelmers Floor, Timmerman Marieke E, Siebenga Femke F, van der Weide Hiska L, Rakers Sandra E, Kramer Miranda C A, van der Hoorn Anouk, Enting Roelien H, Bosma Ingeborg, Groen Rob J M, Jeltema Hanne-Rinck, Wagemakers Michiel, Spikman Jacoba M, Buunk Anne M
Department of Clinical Neuropsychology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, Groningen, AB51, 9700RB, The Netherlands.
Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Neurooncol. 2024 Aug;169(1):95-104. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04704-4. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
Diffuse low-grade gliomas (dLGG) often have a frontal location, which may negatively affect patients' executive functions (EF). Being diagnosed with dLGG and having to undergo intensive treatment can be emotionally stressful. The ability to cope with this stress in an adaptive, active and flexible way may be hampered by impaired EF. Consequently, patients may suffer from increased mental distress. The aim of the present study was to explore profiles of EF, coping and mental distress and identify characteristics of each profile.
151 patients with dLGG were included. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to explore profiles. Additional demographical, tumor and radiological characteristics were included.
Four clusters were found: 1) overall good functioning (25% of patients); 2) poor executive functioning, good psychosocial functioning (32%); 3) good executive functioning, poor psychosocial functioning (18%) and; 4) overall poor functioning (25%). Characteristics of the different clusters were lower educational level and more (micro)vascular brain damage (cluster 2), a younger age (cluster 3), and a larger tumor volume (cluster 4). EF was not a distinctive factor for coping, nor was it for mental distress. Maladaptive coping, however, did distinguish clusters with higher mental distress (cluster 3 and 4) from clusters with lower levels of mental distress (cluster 1 and 2).
Four distinctive clusters with different levels of functioning and characteristics were identified. EF impairments did not hinder the use of active coping strategies. Moreover, maladaptive coping, but not EF impairment, was related to increased mental distress in patients with dLGG.
弥漫性低级别胶质瘤(dLGG)常发生于额叶,这可能会对患者的执行功能(EF)产生负面影响。被诊断为dLGG并不得不接受强化治疗可能会给患者带来情绪压力。执行功能受损可能会妨碍患者以适应性、积极和灵活的方式应对这种压力。因此,患者可能会遭受更多的精神痛苦。本研究的目的是探讨执行功能、应对方式和精神痛苦的概况,并确定每种概况的特征。
纳入151例dLGG患者。采用潜在类别分析(LPA)来探索概况。还纳入了其他人口统计学、肿瘤和放射学特征。
发现了四个类别:1)整体功能良好(占患者的25%);2)执行功能差,社会心理功能良好(32%);3)执行功能良好,社会心理功能差(18%);4)整体功能差(25%)。不同类别的特征包括教育水平较低和更多的(微)血管性脑损伤(类别2)、年龄较小(类别3)和肿瘤体积较大(类别4)。执行功能既不是应对方式的独特影响因素,也不是精神痛苦的独特影响因素。然而,适应不良的应对方式确实区分了精神痛苦程度较高的类别(类别3和4)与精神痛苦程度较低的类别(类别1和2)。
确定了四个具有不同功能水平和特征的独特类别。执行功能受损并未妨碍积极应对策略的使用。此外,适应不良的应对方式而非执行功能受损与dLGG患者精神痛苦增加有关。