Endocrinology Department, Northern Lisbon University Center, Lisbon, Portugal.
Endocrinology Department, Northern Lisbon University Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Endocrinology University Clinic, Lisbon Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2024 May;71(5):216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.018.
It is suggested to wait at least 3 months to repeat a fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to avoid possible inflammatory cytological changes induced by a previous procedure. This study evaluated the influence of the interval between 2 FNACs in a cohort with a previous non-diagnostic (ND) FNAC. We analysed the occurrence of ND or atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) results in the second FNAC, based on the intervals between procedures.
Retrospective study (2017-2020) including thyroid nodules with a ND result, subjected to another FNAC. Demographic, clinical and echographic data, interval between FNACs and their results were collected. We considered the intervals: ≤/>3 months and ≤/>6 months. Second FNAC results were classified as ND, AUS/FLUS or diagnostic (including the other Bethesda categories).
Included 190 nodules (190 patients - 82.1% women, mean age 60±13.7 years) with a first ND FNAC. The second FNAC results were: ND in 63 cases, AUS/FLUS in 9 and diagnostic in 118 cases. There were no statistical differences in FNAC results performed≤3 months (13 ND, 2 AUS/FLUS, 19 diagnostic) vs >3 months (50 ND, 7 AUS/FLUS, 99 diagnostic; p=0.71). Similarly, there were no statistical differences considering a longer time interval: ≤6 months (32 ND, 3 AUS/FLUS, 59 diagnostic) vs >6 months (31 ND, 6 AUS/FLUS, 59 diagnostic; p=0.61).
Time interval between FNACs was not relevant to the final cytological result. Early FNAC repetition did not increase the cases of ND or AUS/FLUS.
有人建议至少等待 3 个月重复进行细针抽吸细胞学检查(FNAC),以避免先前操作引起的可能的炎症性细胞学变化。本研究评估了在先前非诊断性(ND)FNAC 的队列中两次 FNAC 之间的间隔对其影响。我们根据操作之间的间隔分析了第二次 FNAC 中 ND 或意义未明的非典型性/滤泡性病变意义未明(AUS/FLUS)结果的发生。
回顾性研究(2017-2020 年)包括 ND 结果的甲状腺结节,行另一项 FNAC。收集了人口统计学、临床和超声数据,以及 FNAC 之间的间隔及其结果。我们考虑了以下间隔:≤/>3 个月和≤/>6 个月。第二次 FNAC 结果分为 ND、AUS/FLUS 或诊断(包括其他 Bethesda 类别)。
纳入了 190 个结节(190 例患者-82.1%为女性,平均年龄 60±13.7 岁),首次 FNAC 为 ND。第二次 FNAC 结果为:63 例 ND、9 例 AUS/FLUS 和 118 例诊断。在 3 个月内(13 例 ND、2 例 AUS/FLUS、19 例诊断)与 3 个月以上(50 例 ND、7 例 AUS/FLUS、99 例诊断)进行 FNAC 检查的结果无统计学差异(p=0.71)。同样,考虑更长的时间间隔也没有统计学差异:≤6 个月(32 例 ND、3 例 AUS/FLUS、59 例诊断)与>6 个月(31 例 ND、6 例 AUS/FLUS、59 例诊断)相比(p=0.61)。
FNAC 之间的时间间隔与最终细胞学结果无关。早期重复 FNAC 并未增加 ND 或 AUS/FLUS 病例。