• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学检查初始结果不明确后的重复检查:是否存在最佳时机?

Repetition of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology after an initial nondiagnostic result: Is there an optimal timing?

机构信息

Endocrinology Department, Northern Lisbon University Center, Lisbon, Portugal.

Endocrinology Department, Northern Lisbon University Center, Lisbon, Portugal; Endocrinology University Clinic, Lisbon Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2024 May;71(5):216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.018.

DOI:10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.018
PMID:38897705
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is suggested to wait at least 3 months to repeat a fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) to avoid possible inflammatory cytological changes induced by a previous procedure. This study evaluated the influence of the interval between 2 FNACs in a cohort with a previous non-diagnostic (ND) FNAC. We analysed the occurrence of ND or atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) results in the second FNAC, based on the intervals between procedures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study (2017-2020) including thyroid nodules with a ND result, subjected to another FNAC. Demographic, clinical and echographic data, interval between FNACs and their results were collected. We considered the intervals: ≤/>3 months and ≤/>6 months. Second FNAC results were classified as ND, AUS/FLUS or diagnostic (including the other Bethesda categories).

RESULTS

Included 190 nodules (190 patients - 82.1% women, mean age 60±13.7 years) with a first ND FNAC. The second FNAC results were: ND in 63 cases, AUS/FLUS in 9 and diagnostic in 118 cases. There were no statistical differences in FNAC results performed≤3 months (13 ND, 2 AUS/FLUS, 19 diagnostic) vs >3 months (50 ND, 7 AUS/FLUS, 99 diagnostic; p=0.71). Similarly, there were no statistical differences considering a longer time interval: ≤6 months (32 ND, 3 AUS/FLUS, 59 diagnostic) vs >6 months (31 ND, 6 AUS/FLUS, 59 diagnostic; p=0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Time interval between FNACs was not relevant to the final cytological result. Early FNAC repetition did not increase the cases of ND or AUS/FLUS.

摘要

介绍

有人建议至少等待 3 个月重复进行细针抽吸细胞学检查(FNAC),以避免先前操作引起的可能的炎症性细胞学变化。本研究评估了在先前非诊断性(ND)FNAC 的队列中两次 FNAC 之间的间隔对其影响。我们根据操作之间的间隔分析了第二次 FNAC 中 ND 或意义未明的非典型性/滤泡性病变意义未明(AUS/FLUS)结果的发生。

患者和方法

回顾性研究(2017-2020 年)包括 ND 结果的甲状腺结节,行另一项 FNAC。收集了人口统计学、临床和超声数据,以及 FNAC 之间的间隔及其结果。我们考虑了以下间隔:≤/>3 个月和≤/>6 个月。第二次 FNAC 结果分为 ND、AUS/FLUS 或诊断(包括其他 Bethesda 类别)。

结果

纳入了 190 个结节(190 例患者-82.1%为女性,平均年龄 60±13.7 岁),首次 FNAC 为 ND。第二次 FNAC 结果为:63 例 ND、9 例 AUS/FLUS 和 118 例诊断。在 3 个月内(13 例 ND、2 例 AUS/FLUS、19 例诊断)与 3 个月以上(50 例 ND、7 例 AUS/FLUS、99 例诊断)进行 FNAC 检查的结果无统计学差异(p=0.71)。同样,考虑更长的时间间隔也没有统计学差异:≤6 个月(32 例 ND、3 例 AUS/FLUS、59 例诊断)与>6 个月(31 例 ND、6 例 AUS/FLUS、59 例诊断)相比(p=0.61)。

结论

FNAC 之间的时间间隔与最终细胞学结果无关。早期重复 FNAC 并未增加 ND 或 AUS/FLUS 病例。

相似文献

1
Repetition of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology after an initial nondiagnostic result: Is there an optimal timing?甲状腺细针抽吸细胞学检查初始结果不明确后的重复检查:是否存在最佳时机?
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2024 May;71(5):216-220. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2024.03.018.
2
Fine-needle aspiration cytology repetition in thyroid nodules with non-diagnostic findings or atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesions of undetermined significance: Does time matters?细针穿刺细胞学检查在甲状腺结节中对无诊断发现或不明确意义的非典型性/滤泡性病变的重复检查:时间是否重要?
Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2022 Aug;83(4):232-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2022.03.002. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
3
Should we wait 3 months for a repeat aspiration in non-diagnostic/indeterminate thyroid nodules? A cancer centre experience.对于非诊断性/不确定甲状腺结节,我们是否应该等待 3 个月重复抽吸?癌症中心的经验。
Cytopathology. 2020 Nov;31(6):525-532. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12887. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
4
Core-needle biopsy is more useful than repeat fine-needle aspiration in thyroid nodules read as nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance by the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology.在甲状腺细胞病理学报告的 Bethesda 系统中,对于诊断不明确或意义不明确的非典型性甲状腺结节,核心针活检比重复细针抽吸更有用。
Thyroid. 2012 May;22(5):468-75. doi: 10.1089/thy.2011.0185. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
5
Thyroid cytology-nuclear versus architectural atypia within the "Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance" Bethesda category have significantly different rates of malignancy.在“意义不明确的非典型性/意义不明确的滤泡性病变”这一贝塞斯达分类中,甲状腺细胞学检查——核非典型性与结构非典型性的恶性率存在显著差异。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Apr;125(4):245-256. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21823. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
6
Thyroid cytology in Pakistan: An institutional audit of the atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance category.巴基斯坦的甲状腺细胞学:未确定意义的不典型/滤泡性病变不明确意义类别机构审计。
Cytopathology. 2021 Mar;32(2):205-210. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12929. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
7
Timing of the repeat thyroid fine-needle aspiration biopsy: does early repeat biopsy change the rate of nondiagnostic or atypia of undetermined significance cytology result?甲状腺细针抽吸活检的重复时间:早期重复活检是否会改变非诊断性或不确定意义的不典型细胞学结果的发生率?
Endocrine. 2024 Dec;86(3):1065-1072. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03953-7. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
8
Risk of malignancy according to sub-classification of the atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category in the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology.根据甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统中意义未明的非典型性或意义未明的滤泡性病变(AUS/FLUS)类别的亚分类情况,发生恶性肿瘤的风险。
Cytopathology. 2017 Feb;28(1):65-73. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12352. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
9
Follow-up of atypia and follicular lesions of undetermined significance in thyroid fine needle aspiration cytology.甲状腺细针穿刺细胞学检查中不典型病变及意义未明的滤泡性病变的随访
Cytopathology. 2013 Dec;24(6):385-90. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12021. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
10
The impact of atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance and repeat fine-needle aspiration: 5 years before and after implementation of the Bethesda System.意义不明确的非典型性/滤泡性病变及重复细针穿刺活检的影响:贝塞斯达系统实施前后5年
Cancer Cytopathol. 2014 Dec;122(12):866-72. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21468. Epub 2014 Jul 30.