Suppr超能文献

一项基于美国行政索赔数据的队列研究:对传统急性和预防性偏头痛治疗模式相关结局的 3 年随访研究。

A 3-year follow-up study of outcomes associated with patterns of traditional acute and preventive migraine treatment: An administrative claims-based cohort study in the United States.

机构信息

Community Neuroscience Services, Westborough, Massachusetts, USA.

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Headache. 2024 Jul-Aug;64(7):796-809. doi: 10.1111/head.14741. Epub 2024 Jun 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe treatment patterns and direct healthcare costs over 3 years following initiation of standard of care acute and preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine in the United States.

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on long-term (>1 year) migraine treatments patterns and associated outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational cohort study using US claims data from the IBM MarketScan Research Database (January 2010-December 2017). Adults were included if they had a prescription claim for acute migraine treatments (AMT) or preventive migraine treatments (PMT) in the index period (January 2011-December 2014). The AMT cohort was categorized as persistent, cycled, or added-on subgroups; the PMT cohort was categorized PMT-persistent, switched without gaps, or cycled with gaps. Migraine-specific annual direct costs (2017 US$) across AMT and PMT cohort subgroups were summarized at baseline through 3 years from index (follow-up).

RESULTS

During the index period, 20,778 and 42,259 patients initiated an AMT and a PMT, respectively. At the 3-year follow-up, migraine-specific direct costs were lower in the persistent subgroup relative to the non-persistent subgroups in both AMT (mean [SD]: $789 [$1741] vs. $2847 [$8149] in the added-on subgroup and $862 [$5426] for the cycled subgroup) and PMT cohorts (mean [SD]: $1817 [$5892] in the persistent subgroup vs. $4257 [$11,392] in the switched without gaps subgroup and $3269 [$18,540] in the cycled with gaps subgroup). Acute medication overuse was lower in the persistent subgroup (1025/6504 [27.2%]) vs. non-persistent subgroups (11,236/58,863 [32.2%] in cycled with gaps subgroup and 1431/6504 [39.4%] in the switched without gaps subgroup). Most patients used multiple acute (19,717/20,778 [94.9%]) or preventive (38,494/42,259 [91.1%]) pharmacological therapies over 3 years following treatment initiation. Gaps in preventive therapy were common; an average gap ranged from 85 to 211 days (~3-7 months).

CONCLUSION

Migraine-specific annual healthcare costs and acute migraine medication overuse remained lowest among patients with persistent AMT and PMT versus non-persistent treatment. Study findings are limited to the US population. Future studies should compare costs and associated outcomes between newer preventive migraine medications in patients with migraine.

摘要

目的

描述美国偏头痛患者在接受标准急性和预防性偏头痛药物治疗后 3 年内的治疗模式和直接医疗成本。

背景

关于长期(>1 年)偏头痛治疗模式和相关结局的数据有限。

方法

这是一项使用美国 IBM MarketScan 研究数据库(2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月)中的美国索赔数据进行的回顾性、观察性队列研究。如果患者在索引期(2011 年 1 月至 2014 年 12 月)有急性偏头痛治疗药物(AMT)或预防性偏头痛治疗药物(PMT)的处方,则将其纳入研究。AMT 队列分为持续、循环或附加亚组;PMT 队列分为 PMT 持续、无间隙转换或有间隙循环。在基线时,通过索引后 3 年(随访),总结 AMT 和 PMT 队列亚组的偏头痛特异性年度直接成本(2017 年 2017 年美元)。

结果

在索引期内,分别有 20778 名和 42259 名患者开始使用 AMT 和 PMT。在 3 年的随访中,与非持续性亚组相比,持续性亚组的偏头痛特异性直接成本在 AMT(平均值[标准差]:$789 [$1741] vs. $2847 [$8149]在附加亚组和$862 [$5426]在循环亚组)和 PMT 队列(平均值[标准差]:$1817 [$5892]在持续性亚组 vs. $4257 [$11392]在无间隙转换亚组和$3269 [$18540]在有间隙循环亚组)中均较低。持续性亚组(1025/6504 [27.2%])的急性药物滥用发生率低于非持续性亚组(11236/58863 [32.2%]在有间隙循环亚组和 1431/6504 [39.4%]在无间隙转换亚组)。大多数患者在治疗开始后 3 年内使用了多种急性(19717/20778 [94.9%])或预防性(38494/42259 [91.1%])药物疗法。预防性治疗的间隙很常见;平均间隙为 85 至 211 天(~3-7 个月)。

结论

与非持续性治疗相比,持续性 AMT 和 PMT 的偏头痛特异性年度医疗保健成本和急性偏头痛药物滥用率最低。研究结果仅限于美国人群。未来的研究应比较偏头痛患者中新型预防性偏头痛药物的成本和相关结局。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验