• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二叶式主动脉瓣保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术中移植物尺寸的影响:“刚刚好”比例。

Effect of graft sizing in valve-sparing aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve: The Goldilocks ratio.

作者信息

Choi Perry S, Sharir Amit, Ono Yoshikazu, Shibata Masafumi, Kaiser Alexander D, Zhu Yuanjia, Marsden Alison L, Woo Y Joseph, Ma Michael R, Kim Joon Bum

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.

出版信息

JTCVS Tech. 2024 Apr 16;25:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.03.025. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.03.025
PMID:38899072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11184666/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of graft sizing on valve performance in valve-sparing aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve.

METHODS

In addition to a diseased control model, 3 representative groups-free-edge length to aortic/graft diameter (FELAD) ratio <1.3, 1.5 to 1.64, and >1.7-were replicated in explanted porcine aortic roots (n = 3) using straight grafts sized respective to the native free-edge length. They were run on a validated ex vivo univentricular system under physiological parameters for 20 cycles. All groups were tested within the same aortic root to minimize inter-root differences. Outcomes included transvalvular gradient, regurgitation fraction, and orifice area. Linear mixed effects model and pairwise comparisons were employed to compare outcomes across groups.

RESULTS

The diseased control had mean transvalvular gradient 10.9 ± 6.30 mm Hg, regurgitation fraction 32.5 ± 4.91%, and orifice area 1.52 ± 0.12 cm. In ex vivo analysis, all repair groups had improved regurgitation compared with control ( < .001). FELAD <1.3 had the greatest amount of regurgitation among the repair groups ( < .001) and 1.5-1.64 the least ( < .001). FELAD <1.3 and >1.7 exhibited greater mean gradient compared with both control and 1.5 to 1.64 ( < .001). Among the repair groups, 1.5 to 1.64 had the largest orifice area, and >1.7 the smallest ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

For a symmetric bicuspid aortic valve, performance after valve-sparing aortic root replacement shows a bimodal distribution across graft size. As the FELAD ratio departs from 1.5 to 1.64 in either direction, significant increases in transvalvular gradient are observed. FELAD <1.3 may also result in suboptimal improvement of baseline regurgitation.

摘要

目的

研究在保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣时,移植物尺寸对瓣膜性能的影响。

方法

除了一个病变对照模型外,使用根据天然游离缘长度定制尺寸的直形移植物,在离体猪主动脉根部(n = 3)中复制3个代表性组——游离缘长度与主动脉/移植物直径(FELAD)之比<1.3、1.5至1.64和>1.7。它们在经过验证的离体单心室系统上,在生理参数下运行20个周期。所有组均在同一个主动脉根部内进行测试,以尽量减少根部间差异。结果包括跨瓣压差、反流分数和瓣口面积。采用线性混合效应模型和两两比较来比较各组的结果。

结果

病变对照组的平均跨瓣压差为10.9±6.30 mmHg,反流分数为32.5±4.91%,瓣口面积为1.52±0.12 cm²。在离体分析中,与对照组相比,所有修复组的反流均有所改善(P <.001)。在修复组中,FELAD <1.3的反流程度最大(P <.001),1.5 - 1.64的反流程度最小(P <.001)。与对照组和1.5至1.64组相比,FELAD <1.3和>1.7组的平均压差更大(P <.001)。在修复组中,1.5至1.64组的瓣口面积最大,>1.7组的瓣口面积最小(P <.001)。

结论

对于对称性二叶式主动脉瓣,保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术后的性能在移植物尺寸上呈现双峰分布。当FELAD比值在任一方向偏离1.5至1.64时,观察到跨瓣压差显著增加。FELAD <1.3也可能导致基线反流的改善不理想。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/5ff1b86740ed/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/075104fecb21/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/d1ce34c93467/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/132b72f7d21c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/b6596b2af815/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/2ad84f41b2ac/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/5ff1b86740ed/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/075104fecb21/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/d1ce34c93467/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/132b72f7d21c/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/b6596b2af815/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/2ad84f41b2ac/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/232d/11184666/5ff1b86740ed/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of graft sizing in valve-sparing aortic root replacement for bicuspid aortic valve: The Goldilocks ratio.二叶式主动脉瓣保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术中移植物尺寸的影响:“刚刚好”比例。
JTCVS Tech. 2024 Apr 16;25:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.03.025. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Impact of positional relationship of commissures on cusp function after valve-sparing root replacement for regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve.反流性二叶式主动脉瓣保留瓣膜根部置换术后连合处位置关系对瓣叶功能的影响
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jul;50(1):75-81. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv438. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
3
Incidence and progression of mild aortic regurgitation after Tirone David reimplantation valve-sparing aortic root replacement.经 Tirone David 主动脉瓣保留式主动脉根部替换术后轻度主动脉瓣反流的发生率和进展情况。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):169-77, 178.e1-178.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
4
Comprehensive Ex Vivo Comparison of 5 Clinically Used Conduit Configurations for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement Using a 3-Dimensional-Printed Heart Simulator.使用 3D 打印心脏模拟器对 5 种临床常用的主动脉瓣保留型主动脉根部替换管道配置进行全面的离体比较。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 6;142(14):1361-1373. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046612. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
5
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Aortic Insufficiency After Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement.保留主动脉根部瓣膜置换术后经导管主动脉瓣置换治疗二叶式主动脉瓣关闭不全
JACC Case Rep. 2021 Dec 1;3(17):1798-1802. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.07.018.
6
German Aortic Root Repair Registry-Insights From the First 400 Consecutive Patients.德国主动脉根部修复登记研究——400 例连续患者的结果分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 Feb;113(2):608-615. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.03.060. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
7
Novel bicuspid aortic valve model with aortic regurgitation for hemodynamic status analysis using an ex vivo simulator.新型二叶式主动脉瓣伴主动脉瓣反流的离体模拟模型用于血液动力学状态分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;163(2):e161-e171. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.028. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
Bicuspid aortic valve repair by complete conversion from "raphe'd" (type 1) to "symmetric" (type 0) morphology.通过从“有嵴”(1型)完全转变为“对称”(0型)形态来修复二叶式主动脉瓣。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Dec;148(6):2862-8.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 May 15.
9
Bicuspid Aortic Insufficiency With Aortic Root Aneurysm: Root Reimplantation Versus Bentall Root Replacement.合并主动脉根部瘤的二叶式主动脉瓣关闭不全:根部再植入术与Bentall根部置换术
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Oct;102(4):1221-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.087. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
10
The role of annular dimension and annuloplasty in tricuspid aortic valve repair.瓣环尺寸及瓣环成形术在三尖瓣主动脉瓣修复中的作用。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):428-37; discussion 437-8. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv050. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A fluid-structure interaction model of the zebrafish aortic valve.斑马鱼主动脉瓣的流固耦合模型。
J Biomech. 2025 Jun 11;190:112794. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112794.

本文引用的文献

1
Simulation-based design of bicuspidization of the aortic valve.基于模拟的主动脉瓣二叶化设计。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;168(3):923-932.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.12.027. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
2
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: Long-term variables significantly associated with mortality and morbidity.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部置换术:与死亡率和发病率显著相关的长期变量。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jan;169(1):68-77.e0. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.11.027. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Biomechanics and clinical outcomes of various conduit configurations in valve sparing aortic root replacement.
保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术中不同管道构型的生物力学与临床结果
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jul 31;12(4):326-337. doi: 10.21037/acs-2023-avs2-0068. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
4
Long-term outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root versus composite aortic valve graft replacement for aortic root aneurysm: Meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data.保留瓣膜的主动脉根部与复合主动脉瓣移植物置换治疗主动脉根部瘤的长期结果:重建时间事件数据的荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2023 Sep;226(3):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
5
Outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid aortic valve and tricuspid aortic valve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.二叶式主动脉瓣和三叶式主动脉瓣患者行保留瓣膜主动脉根部替换术的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Jul 3;18(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02329-8.
6
Valve-sparing root replacement versus composite valve graft root replacement: Analysis of more than 1500 patients from 2 aortic centers.保留瓣膜的根部替换与复合瓣膜移植物根部替换:2 个主动脉中心的 1500 多例患者分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Sep;168(3):770-780.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.05.022. Epub 2023 May 26.
7
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in bicuspid aortic valve: as good as in tricuspid?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 3;63(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad161.
8
Bicuspid aortic valve durability with valve-sparing aortic root replacement: comparison to tricuspid valve.保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术治疗二叶式主动脉瓣的耐久性:与三叶式主动脉瓣的比较
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Apr 3;63(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad030.
9
Comprehensive Ex Vivo Comparison of 5 Clinically Used Conduit Configurations for Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement Using a 3-Dimensional-Printed Heart Simulator.使用 3D 打印心脏模拟器对 5 种临床常用的主动脉瓣保留型主动脉根部替换管道配置进行全面的离体比较。
Circulation. 2020 Oct 6;142(14):1361-1373. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046612. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
Novel bicuspid aortic valve model with aortic regurgitation for hemodynamic status analysis using an ex vivo simulator.新型二叶式主动脉瓣伴主动脉瓣反流的离体模拟模型用于血液动力学状态分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;163(2):e161-e171. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.028. Epub 2020 Jun 29.