Suppr超能文献

我的身体比你的好吗?对有和没有饮食失调症的个体进行德文版上下身外貌比较量表的验证。

Is my body better than yours? Validation of the German version of the Upward and Downward Physical Appearance Comparison Scales in individuals with and without eating disorders.

作者信息

Schönhals Kristine, Quittkat Hannah L, Voges Mona M, Ladwig Gritt, Holtmann Friederike-Johanna, Vocks Silja

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 May 28;15:1390063. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390063. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study examines the psychometric properties of a German version of the Upward and Downward Physical Appearance Comparison Scales (UPACS and DACS).

METHODS

A total of 2,114 participants, consisting of 1,360 women without eating disorders (  = 25.73,  = 6.84), 304 men without eating disorders (  = 24.48,  = 6.34), and 450 women with eating disorders (  = 27.11,  = 7.21), completed the UPACS and DACS as well as further questionnaires on appearance comparisons, eating disorder pathology, and self-esteem.

RESULTS

Structural equation modeling confirmed the proposed one-factor structure of the original English-language version of the DACS but not of the UPACS. Both scales showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The UPACS and DACS showed the expected correlations with related constructs, indicating acceptable construct validity, with some limitations for women with eating disorders.

DISCUSSION

Overall, this study indicates that the German versions of the UPACS and DACS are psychometrically suitable for assessing upward and downward physical appearance comparisons in women and men without eating disorders and women with eating disorders in research and clinical practice.

摘要

引言

本研究考察了德文版的向上和向下身体外貌比较量表(UPACS和DACS)的心理测量特性。

方法

共有2114名参与者,包括1360名无饮食失调的女性(年龄均值=25.73,标准差=6.84)、304名无饮食失调的男性(年龄均值=24.48,标准差=6.34)以及450名有饮食失调的女性(年龄均值=27.11,标准差=7.21),他们完成了UPACS和DACS以及关于外貌比较、饮食失调病理学和自尊的其他问卷。

结果

结构方程模型证实了原始英文版DACS所提议的单因素结构,但未证实UPACS的单因素结构。两个量表均显示出良好的内部一致性和重测信度。UPACS和DACS与相关构念呈现出预期的相关性,表明具有可接受的结构效度,但对有饮食失调的女性存在一些局限性。

讨论

总体而言,本研究表明,德文版的UPACS和DACS在心理测量学上适用于在研究和临床实践中评估无饮食失调的女性和男性以及有饮食失调的女性的向上和向下身体外貌比较。

相似文献

2
The structure and validity of directional measures of appearance social comparison among emerging adults in China.
Body Image. 2014 Sep;11(4):464-73. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.07.001. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
7
8
Appearance comparisons styles and eating disordered symptoms in women.女性的外貌比较风格与饮食失调症状
Eat Behav. 2016 Dec;23:7-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验