Au Sunny Chi Lik
Department of Ophthalmology, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China.
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Jun 6;12(16):2701-2703. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i16.2701.
Scientific evidence develops bit by bit from case reports, case series; to larger case-control, case-cohort; and further escalate to randomized controlled trials. This echoed the importance of continue publishing , where novel and advancing discoveries start from a single case. In contrast, at the other end of the realm of evidence synthesis, systematic review and meta-analysis represent distinct yet interconnected processes. Butorphanol in epidural labor analgesia has long been studied since 1989, and with 70 publications from MEDLINE searches. However, there was no meta-analysis, nor any systematic review published so far. The latest in-press article published by Tang on the protocol for the systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety and effectiveness of butorphanol in epidural labor analgesia is encouraging. We believe the findings of this study will be valuable for clinical practice as well as for future research.
科学证据是逐步发展起来的,从病例报告、病例系列,到更大规模的病例对照、病例队列研究;并进一步升级到随机对照试验。这反映了持续发表的重要性,新的和不断推进的发现始于单个病例。相比之下,在证据综合领域的另一端,系统评价和荟萃分析代表着不同但相互关联的过程。自1989年以来,布托啡诺用于硬膜外分娩镇痛的研究已有很长时间,通过MEDLINE检索有70篇相关出版物。然而,到目前为止,尚无荟萃分析,也没有任何系统评价发表。唐最近发表的关于布托啡诺用于硬膜外分娩镇痛的安全性和有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案的文章令人鼓舞。我们相信这项研究的结果对临床实践以及未来的研究都将是有价值的。