Suppr超能文献

不同混合方式对 AH Plus 根管糊剂理化性能及根管封闭性能的影响

Does the Mixing Method of AH Plus Jet Affect its Physicochemical and Mechanical Properties?

机构信息

Department of Operative Dentistry, Endodontics, and Dental Materials, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo - USP, Bauru, Brazil.

Department of Endodontics, School of Dentistry, Grande Rio University (UNIGRANRIO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

J Endod. 2024 Sep;50(9):1333-1339. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the mixing method of AH Plus Jet sealer affects its physicochemical and mechanical properties.

METHODS

The properties of AH Plus Jet sealer were analyzed when mixed using either the Auto Mix Tip or manual mixing. The evaluated properties included radiopacity (n = 5), initial and final setting times (n = 5), flow (n = 5), and solubility (n = 3), following specifications outlined in ISO 6876/2012 and ADA Nº 57/2000. pH levels were measured at intervals of 3, 24, 72, and 168 hours (n = 10). The push-out bond strength test was conducted using a universal testing machine and using bovine teeth (n = 30). Failure modes were analyzed with stereomicroscopy. Porosity was evaluated under micro-CT (n = 5), and scanning electron microscopy was also performed (n = 5). One-way analysis of variance and Tukey, unpaired t-tests, or Mann-Whitney tests were used with a significance level of 5%.

RESULTS

The Auto Mix exhibited a radiopacity value of 12.11 mmAl, whereas manual mixing resulted in 12.55 mmAl (P > .05). For initial and final setting times, Auto Mix showed 901 minutes and 1779 minutes, respectively, while manual mixing recorded values of 631 minutes and 1504 minutes (P < .05). In terms of flow, Auto Mix demonstrated higher values (25.26 mm) than manual mixing (21.71 mm) (P < .05). No statistical differences were observed between the two methods for solubility and pH (P > .05). Manual mixing presented a higher bond strength value (14.52 MPa) than Auto Mix (9.81 MPa) (P < .05). The mixed failure mode was the most frequent outcome for both methods. The highest porosity was observed for Auto Mix (P < .05). Scanning electron microscopy analysis revealed that manual mixing resulted in a smoother surface with fewer pores and smaller, more evenly distributed agglomerates compared to automatic mixing.

CONCLUSION

The mixing method employed for AH Plus Jet sealer influences some physicochemical and mechanical properties of the material.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在评估 AH Plus Jet 根管封闭剂的混合方法是否会影响其理化和力学性能。

方法

采用自动混合管嘴或手动混合两种方法对 AH Plus Jet 根管封闭剂进行混合,并对其理化性能进行分析。评估的性能包括射线可透性(n=5)、初始凝固时间和最终凝固时间(n=5)、流动度(n=5)和溶解度(n=3),均按照 ISO 6876/2012 和 ADA Nº 57/2000 中的规定进行测量。pH 值分别在 3、24、72 和 168 小时(n=10)进行测量。使用万能试验机和牛牙进行推出强度测试(n=30)。采用体视显微镜分析失效模式。采用微 CT 评估孔隙率(n=5),并进行扫描电子显微镜分析(n=5)。采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey、非配对 t 检验或 Mann-Whitney 检验,显著性水平为 5%。

结果

自动混合的射线可透性值为 12.11mmAl,而手动混合的射线可透性值为 12.55mmAl(P>.05)。初始凝固时间和最终凝固时间方面,自动混合分别为 901 分钟和 1779 分钟,而手动混合分别为 631 分钟和 1504 分钟(P<.05)。在流动度方面,自动混合的流动度值为 25.26mm,高于手动混合的流动度值 21.71mm(P<.05)。两种方法在溶解度和 pH 值方面无统计学差异(P>.05)。手动混合的粘结强度值(14.52MPa)高于自动混合(9.81MPa)(P<.05)。混合失败模式是两种方法中最常见的结果。自动混合的孔隙率最高(P<.05)。扫描电子显微镜分析表明,与自动混合相比,手动混合的表面更光滑,孔隙更少,团聚体更小且分布更均匀。

结论

AH Plus Jet 根管封闭剂的混合方法会影响材料的一些理化和力学性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验