Suppr超能文献

优化实施:阐明行为改变技术及相应策略对决定因素和实施绩效的作用:一项横断面研究。

Optimizing implementation: elucidating the role of behavior change techniques and corresponding strategies on determinants and implementation performance: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Dubbeldeman Eveline M, Crone Mathilde R, Kiefte-de Jong Jessica Christina, van der Kleij Rianne M J J

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Health Promotion, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Jun 20;5(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00604-w.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Behavior change techniques (BCTs) are considered as active components of implementation strategies, influencing determinants and, ultimately, implementation performance. In our previous Delphi study, experts formulated 'implementation hypotheses', detailing how specific combinations of BCTs and strategies (referred to as BCT-strategy combinations) might influence determinants and guideline implementation within youth care. For example, educational meetings providing instructions on guideline use were hypothesized to enhance practitioners' knowledge and, consequently, guideline implementation. However, these hypotheses have not been verified in practice yet.

METHOD

We conducted a cross-sectional study involving practitioners and management professionals from youth (health)care organizations. Using questionnaires, we obtained data on the presence of BCT-strategy combinations and their perceived influence on determinants and implementation performance. Chi-squared tests and regression analyses were employed to determine the influence of specific BCT-strategy combinations on determinants and implementation performance.

RESULTS

Our analyses included data from 104 practitioners and 34 management professionals. Most of the management professionals indicated that the BCT-strategy combinations positively influenced or had the potential to influence their implementation performance. At the practitioner level, half of the combinations were perceived to have a positive influence on determinants and implementation performance. Furthermore, practitioners who reported the absence of BCT-strategy combinations were more skeptical about their potential influence on determinants and implementation performance.

CONCLUSION

Several BCT-strategy combinations were perceived to improve or potentially improve implementation performance of both practitioners and management professionals. In the development and evaluation of implementation efforts, we advocate for clearly describing the implementation effort's objective and using frameworks that detail the BCTs inducing behavior change, the strategy employed, and the processes driving the observed changes. Understanding these interconnected processes is important in designing targeted, evidence-based behavior change interventions. This understanding optimizes resource allocation and contributes to the overall success of implementation efforts in youth care.

摘要

引言

行为改变技术(BCTs)被视为实施策略的积极组成部分,影响决定因素,并最终影响实施绩效。在我们之前的德尔菲研究中,专家们制定了“实施假设”,详细说明了BCTs与策略的特定组合(称为BCT-策略组合)如何可能影响青少年护理中的决定因素和指南实施。例如,假设提供指南使用说明的教育会议能够增强从业者的知识,从而促进指南的实施。然而,这些假设尚未在实践中得到验证。

方法

我们进行了一项横断面研究,涉及青少年(健康)护理组织的从业者和管理专业人员。通过问卷调查,我们获得了关于BCT-策略组合的存在及其对决定因素和实施绩效的感知影响的数据。采用卡方检验和回归分析来确定特定BCT-策略组合对决定因素和实施绩效的影响。

结果

我们的分析纳入了104名从业者和34名管理专业人员的数据。大多数管理专业人员表示,BCT-策略组合对其实施绩效有积极影响或有可能产生积极影响。在从业者层面,一半的组合被认为对决定因素和实施绩效有积极影响。此外,报告不存在BCT-策略组合的从业者对其对决定因素和实施绩效的潜在影响更为怀疑。

结论

一些BCT-策略组合被认为可以改善或有可能改善从业者和管理专业人员的实施绩效。在实施工作的开发和评估中,我们主张清晰描述实施工作的目标,并使用详细说明引发行为改变的BCTs、所采用的策略以及推动观察到的变化的过程的框架。理解这些相互关联的过程对于设计有针对性的、基于证据的行为改变干预措施很重要。这种理解优化了资源分配,并有助于青少年护理实施工作的整体成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1cf/11191141/b67b698e5b8b/43058_2024_604_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验