在针对老年人的身体活动计划和服务中使用行为改变技术:快速审查的结果。

Use of behavior change techniques in physical activity programs and services for older adults: findings from a rapid review.

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney, Gadigal Country, Sydney, Australia.

Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney and Sydney Local Health District, Gadigal Country, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Behav Med. 2024 Feb 10;58(3):216-226. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad074.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding behavior change techniques (BCTs) used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of physical activity programs/services for older adults can help us to guide their implementation in real-world settings.

PURPOSE

This study aims to: (a) identify the number and type of BCTs used in physical activity programs/services for older adults evaluated in large, good quality RCTs and (b) explore the impact of different BCTs on different outcome domains.

METHODS

This is a secondary data analysis of a WHO-commissioned rapid review of physical activity programs/services for older adults. Fifty-six trials testing 70 interventions were coded for the type and number of BCTs present using a published BCT taxonomy. The proportion of positive effects found from physical activity interventions using the most common BCTs was calculated for the outcomes of physical activity, intrinsic capacity, functional ability, social domain, cognitive and emotional functioning, and well-being and quality of life.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of the 93 possible BCTs were identified in the included trials and 529 BCTs in total (mean 7.6, range 2-17). The most common BCTs were "action planning" (68/70 interventions), "instructions on how to perform a behavior" (60/70), "graded tasks" (53/70), "demonstration of behavior" (44/70), and "behavioral practice/rehearsal" (43/70). Interventions that used any of the most common BCTs showed overwhelmingly positive impacts on physical activity and social domain outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Consideration of which BCTs are included in interventions and their impact on outcomes can improve the effectiveness and implementation of future interventions. To enable this, providers can design, implement, and evaluate interventions using a BCT taxonomy.

摘要

背景

了解体力活动计划/服务的随机对照试验(RCT)中使用的行为改变技术(BCT)可以帮助我们指导其在真实环境中的实施。

目的

本研究旨在:(a)确定在大型高质量 RCT 中评估的老年人体力活动计划/服务中使用的 BCT 的数量和类型;(b)探讨不同 BCT 对不同结果领域的影响。

方法

这是对世界卫生组织委托的老年人体力活动计划/服务快速审查的二次数据分析。56 项试验测试了 70 项干预措施,使用已发表的 BCT 分类法对存在的 BCT 类型和数量进行编码。使用最常见的 BCT 计算体力活动干预对体力活动、内在能力、功能能力、社会领域、认知和情绪功能以及福祉和生活质量的积极影响的比例。

结果

在纳入的试验中确定了 93 个可能的 BCT 中的 39 个,总共 529 个 BCT(平均 7.6,范围 2-17)。最常见的 BCT 是“行动计划”(68/70 项干预措施)、“如何执行行为的说明”(60/70)、“分级任务”(53/70)、“行为示范”(44/70)和“行为实践/排练”(43/70)。使用任何最常见 BCT 的干预措施对体力活动和社会领域的结果都产生了压倒性的积极影响。

结论

考虑干预措施中包含的 BCT 及其对结果的影响,可以提高未来干预措施的有效性和实施。为此,提供者可以使用 BCT 分类法设计、实施和评估干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cb9/10858305/5c3fd21dddf8/kaad074_fig1.jpg

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索