Dickerson John F, Clarke Greg, Weersing V Robin, Lynch Frances L, Hollon Steven D, Brent David, Beardslee William, Gladstone Tracy R G, Porta Giovanna, DeBar Lynn, Brooks Neon, Garber Judy
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, Oregon 97227, USA.
Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University and University of California, San Diego, California 92120-4913, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 8;194(1):19-26. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae131.
The current study estimated effects of intervention dose (attendance) of a cognitive behavioral prevention (CBP) program on depression-free days (DFDs) in adolescent offspring of parents with a history of depression. As part of secondary analyses of a multisite randomized controlled trial, we analyzed the complete intention-to-treat sample of 316 at-risk adolescents ages 13 to 17 years. Youth were randomly assigned to the CBP program plus usual care (n = 159) or to usual care alone (n = 157). The CBP program involved 8 weekly acute sessions and 6 monthly continuation sessions. Results showed that higher CBP program dose predicted more DFDs, with a key threshold of approximately 75% of a full dose in analyses employing instrumental variable methodology to control multiple channels of bias. Specifically, attending at more than 75% of acute phase sessions led to 45.3 more DFDs over the 9-month period after randomization, which accounted for over 12% of the total follow-up days. Instrument sets were informed by study variables and external data, including weather and travel burden. In contrast, conventional analysis methods failed to find a significant dose-outcome relation. Application of the instrumental variable approach, which better controls the influence of confounding, demonstrated that higher CBP program dose resulted in more DFDs. This article is part of a Special Collection on Mental Health.
本研究评估了认知行为预防(CBP)项目的干预剂量(参与度)对有抑郁症病史父母的青少年后代无抑郁天数(DFDs)的影响。作为一项多中心随机对照试验二次分析的一部分,我们分析了316名年龄在13至17岁的高危青少年的完整意向性治疗样本。青少年被随机分配到CBP项目加常规护理组(n = 159)或仅常规护理组(n = 157)。CBP项目包括8次每周一次的急性期课程和6次每月一次的延续期课程。结果显示,较高的CBP项目剂量预示着更多的无抑郁天数,在采用工具变量法控制多种偏差渠道的分析中,关键阈值约为全剂量的75%。具体而言,在急性期课程中参与率超过75%会使随机分组后9个月内的无抑郁天数增加45.3天,这占总随访天数的12%以上。工具集由研究变量和外部数据(包括天气和出行负担)提供信息。相比之下,传统分析方法未发现显著的剂量-结局关系。应用能更好地控制混杂因素影响的工具变量法表明,较高的CBP项目剂量会带来更多的无抑郁天数。本文是心理健康专题文集的一部分。