• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预防高危青少年抑郁:长期效果。

Prevention of depression in at-risk adolescents: longer-term effects.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts2Judge Baker Children's Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;70(11):1161-70. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.295.

DOI:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.295
PMID:24005242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3978119/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Adolescent offspring of depressed parents are at high risk for experiencing depressive disorders themselves.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the positive effects of a group cognitive-behavioral prevention (CBP) program extended to longer-term (multiyear) follow-up.

DESIGN

A 4-site randomized clinical trial with 33 months of follow-up was conducted. Recruitment of participants was from August 2003 through February 2006.

SETTING

The study settings included a health maintenance organization, university medical centers, and a community mental health center.

PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred sixteen adolescent (aged 13-17 years) offspring of parents with current and/or prior depressive disorders; adolescents had histories of depression, current elevated depressive symptoms, or both but did not currently meet criteria for a depressive disorder.

INTERVENTIONS

The CBP program consisted of 8 weekly 90-minute group sessions followed by 6 monthly continuation sessions. Adolescents were randomly assigned to either the CBP program or usual care (UC).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was a probable or definite episode of depression (Depression Symptom Rating score ≥4) for at least 2 weeks through the month 33 follow-up evaluation.

RESULTS

Over the 33-month follow-up period, youths in the CBP condition had significantly fewer onsets of depressive episodes compared with those in UC. Parental depression at baseline significantly moderated the intervention effect. When parents were not depressed at intake, CBP was superior to UC (number needed to treat, 6), whereas when parents were actively depressed at baseline, average onset rates between CBP and UC were not significantly different. A 3-way interaction among intervention, baseline parental depression, and site indicated that the impact of parental depression on intervention effectiveness varied across sites.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The CBP program showed significant sustained effects compared with UC in preventing the onset of depressive episodes in at-risk youth over a nearly 3-year period. Important next steps will be to strengthen the CBP intervention to further enhance its preventive effects, improve intervention outcomes when parents are currently depressed, and conduct larger implementation trials to test the broader public health impact of the CBP program for preventing depression in youth.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00073671.

摘要

重要性

抑郁父母的青少年子女自身也面临着患抑郁障碍的高风险。

目的

确定团体认知行为预防(CBP)方案的积极效果是否可以延伸至更长时间(多年)的随访。

设计

这是一项为期 33 个月随访的 4 个地点随机临床试验。参与者的招募工作于 2003 年 8 月至 2006 年 2 月进行。

地点

研究地点包括健康维护组织、大学医疗中心和社区心理健康中心。

参与者

316 名青少年(年龄 13-17 岁)为当前和/或既往有抑郁障碍的父母的子女;青少年有抑郁史、当前有抑郁症状升高或两者兼有,但目前不符合抑郁障碍的诊断标准。

干预

CBP 方案由 8 次每周 90 分钟的团体会议和 6 次每月的延续性会议组成。青少年被随机分配到 CBP 方案或常规护理(UC)组。

主要结果和措施

主要结局是通过第 33 个月随访评估,抑郁症状评定量表(Depression Symptom Rating score)≥4 分至少 2 周的可能或确定的抑郁发作。

结果

在 33 个月的随访期间,CBP 组的青少年发作抑郁发作的次数明显少于 UC 组。基线时父母的抑郁情况显著调节了干预效果。当父母在入组时没有抑郁时,CBP 优于 UC(需要治疗的人数,6),而当父母在基线时处于活跃抑郁状态时,CBP 和 UC 之间的平均发作率没有显著差异。干预、基线时父母的抑郁情况和地点之间的 3 向交互表明,父母抑郁对干预效果的影响在各地点之间有所不同。

结论和相关性

与 UC 相比,CBP 方案在近 3 年的时间内显著持续地预防了高危青少年抑郁发作。下一步重要的是加强 CBP 干预,以进一步增强其预防效果,改善当父母当前抑郁时的干预结果,并开展更大规模的实施试验,以检验 CBP 方案预防青少年抑郁的更广泛的公共卫生影响。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00073671。

相似文献

1
Prevention of depression in at-risk adolescents: longer-term effects.预防高危青少年抑郁:长期效果。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;70(11):1161-70. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.295.
2
Effect of a Cognitive-Behavioral Prevention Program on Depression 6 Years After Implementation Among At-Risk Adolescents: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项认知行为预防计划对高危青少年实施6年后抑郁症的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Nov;72(11):1110-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.1559.
3
Prevention of depression in at-risk adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.预防高危青少年抑郁症:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2009 Jun 3;301(21):2215-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.788.
4
Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Depression Among At-Risk Youths: Postintervention and 2-Year Follow-Up.预防高危青少年抑郁的成本效益:干预后和 2 年随访。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Apr 1;70(4):279-286. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800144. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
5
Prevention of Depression in At-Risk Adolescents: Predictors and Moderators of Acute Effects.预防高危青少年的抑郁症:急性效应的预测因素和调节因素
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;55(3):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
6
Effectiveness of depression and anxiety prevention in adolescents with high familial risk: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.对有高家族风险的青少年进行抑郁和焦虑预防的有效性:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Psychiatry. 2013 Nov 22;13:316. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-13-316.
7
A family-based approach to the prevention of depressive symptoms in children at risk: evidence of parental and child change.一种基于家庭的方法预防有风险儿童的抑郁症状:父母和儿童变化的证据。
Pediatrics. 2003 Aug;112(2):e119-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.112.2.e119.
8
A randomized trial of a group cognitive intervention for preventing depression in adolescent offspring of depressed parents.一项针对预防抑郁症父母的青少年后代患抑郁症的团体认知干预随机试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 Dec;58(12):1127-34. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.58.12.1127.
9
Effects of an adolescent depression prevention program on maternal criticisms and positive remarks.青少年抑郁预防计划对母亲批评和积极评价的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Dec;34(8):927-937. doi: 10.1037/fam0000779. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
10
Medium-Term Effects of a Tailored Web-Based Parenting Intervention to Reduce Adolescent Risk of Depression and Anxiety: 12-Month Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于网络的个性化育儿干预措施对降低青少年抑郁和焦虑风险的中期影响:一项随机对照试验的12个月研究结果
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 15;21(8):e13628. doi: 10.2196/13628.

引用本文的文献

1
Concussion Health Improvement Program (CHIP): study protocol for a randomized controlled optimization trial for youth with persistent post-concussive symptoms.脑震荡健康改善计划(CHIP):一项针对持续性脑震荡后症状青少年的随机对照优化试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Oct 9;25(1):668. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08494-y.
2
Cognitive behavioral program for the prevention of depression in at-risk adolescents: isolating the effects of dose.预防高危青少年抑郁症的认知行为项目:分离剂量效应
Am J Epidemiol. 2025 Jan 8;194(1):19-26. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwae131.
3
Prevalence and correlates of internalizing and externalizing mental health problems among in-school adolescents in eastern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults.《使用流行病学研究中心抑郁量表评估青少年和青年群体的抑郁症状》。
J Youth Adolesc. 1991 Apr;20(2):149-66. doi: 10.1007/BF01537606.
2
Psychological and educational interventions for preventing depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub3.
3
Transmission and prevention of mood disorders among children of affectively ill parents: a review.
埃塞俄比亚东部在校青少年内化和外化心理健康问题的流行情况及其相关性:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 12;14(1):3574. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54145-2.
4
Long-term effects of psychosocial interventions for adolescents on depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年心理社会干预对抑郁和焦虑的长期影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Jan 5;68:102382. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102382. eCollection 2024 Feb.
5
A comparison of the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural interventions based on delivery features for elevated symptoms of depression in adolescents: A systematic review.基于交付特征的认知行为干预对青少年抑郁症状加重的有效性比较:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 7;20(1):e1376. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1376. eCollection 2024 Mar.
6
A randomized controlled trial of a preventive intervention for the children of parents with depression: mid-term effects, mediators and moderators.一项针对父母患有抑郁症的儿童的预防干预的随机对照试验:中期效果、中介因素和调节因素。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 21;23(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04926-2.
7
Negative Emotions in Chinese Frontline Medical Staff During the Early Stage of the COVID-19 Epidemic: Status, Trend, and Influential Pathways Based on a National Investigation.新冠疫情早期中国一线医务人员的负面情绪:基于全国调查的现状、趋势及影响路径
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 23;12:567446. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.567446. eCollection 2021.
8
Parent-focused prevention of adolescent health risk behavior: Study protocol for a multisite cluster-randomized trial implemented in pediatric primary care.以家长为中心预防青少年健康风险行为:在儿科初级保健中实施的一项多地点群组随机试验的研究方案。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Jan;112:106621. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106621. Epub 2021 Nov 14.
9
A randomised controlled trial of a family-group cognitive-behavioural (FGCB) preventive intervention for the children of parents with depression: short-term effects on symptoms and possible mechanisms.一项针对患有抑郁症父母的子女的家庭组认知行为(FGCB)预防性干预的随机对照试验:对症状的短期影响及可能机制
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2021 Oct 1;15(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13034-021-00394-2.
10
Long-term cross-over effects of the family check-up prevention program on child and adolescent depression: Integrative data analysis of three randomized trials.家庭检查预防计划对儿童和青少年抑郁的长期交叉影响:三项随机试验的综合数据分析。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Sep;89(9):773-782. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000677.
情感障碍父母的子女中的情绪障碍的传递和预防:综述。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;50(11):1098-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2011.07.020. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
4
Family group cognitive-behavioral preventive intervention for families of depressed parents: 18- and 24-month outcomes.家庭团体认知行为预防干预对抑郁父母家庭的影响:18 个月和 24 个月的结果。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Aug;79(4):488-99. doi: 10.1037/a0024254.
5
Remission of depression in parents: links to healthy functioning in their children.父母抑郁的缓解与他们孩子的健康功能有关。
Child Dev. 2011 Jan-Feb;82(1):226-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01552.x.
6
Six-year follow-up of a preventive intervention for parentally bereaved youths: a randomized controlled trial.对父母丧亲青少年预防性干预的六年随访:一项随机对照试验
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010 Oct;164(10):907-14. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.173.
7
Coping and parenting: Mediators of 12-month outcomes of a family group cognitive-behavioral preventive intervention with families of depressed parents.应对方式和教养方式:抑郁父母家庭的家庭团体认知行为预防干预 12 个月结局的中介因素。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):623-34. doi: 10.1037/a0020459.
8
Burden of psychiatric disorder in young adulthood and life outcomes at age 30.青年期精神障碍的负担与 30 岁时的生活结局。
Br J Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;197(2):122-7. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.109.076570.
9
Evaluating Group-Based Interventions When Control Participants Are Ungrouped.当对照参与者未分组时评估基于小组的干预措施。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2008 Apr 2;43(2):210-236. doi: 10.1080/00273170802034810.
10
The long-term effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as a relapse prevention treatment for major depressive disorder.正念认知疗法作为预防复发性重度抑郁症的长期效果。
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2010 Oct;38(5):561-76. doi: 10.1017/S135246581000010X. Epub 2010 Apr 7.