利用相对引文比评估眼科青光眼专家的研究生产力。
Evaluation of Research Productivity among Academic Glaucoma Specialists Using the Relative Citation Ratio.
机构信息
Cole Eye Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Ophthalmology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Department of Ophthalmology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
出版信息
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2024 Nov-Dec;7(6):531-538. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.06.004. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
PURPOSE
To provide relative citation ratio (RCR) benchmark data for the field of glaucoma.
DESIGN
Cross-sectional bibliometric analysis.
SUBJECTS
Fellowship-trained glaucoma faculty at Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited institutions.
METHODS
Glaucoma faculty were individually indexed using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) iCite website. Publication count, mean RCR score, and weighted RCR score were collected for each author between May and August 2023 and included PubMed-listed articles from 1980 to 2023. Data were compared by sex, career duration, academic rank, and acquisition of a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Total number of publications, mean RCR value, and weighted RCR value.
RESULTS
Five hundred twenty-six academic glaucoma specialists from 113 institutions were indexed. These physicians produced highly impactful research with a median publication count of 13 (interquartile range [IQR] 4-38), median RCR of 1.41 (IQR 0.97-1.98), and median weighted RCR of 16.89 (4.80-63.39). Academic rank, career duration, and having a PhD were associated with increased publication count, mean RCR, and weighted RCR. Publication count and weighted RCR differed significantly by sex; however, no difference was observed with mean RCR.
CONCLUSIONS
Current academic glaucoma specialists have high mean RCR values relative to the NIH standard RCR value of 1. This benchmark data serve as a more accurate gauge of research impact within the glaucoma community and can be used to inform self, institutional, and departmental evaluations. Additionally, the mean RCR may provide an accurate metric for quantifying research productivity among historically underrepresented groups that are disadvantaged by time-dependent factors such as number of publications.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
目的
为青光眼领域提供相对引文比（RCR）基准数据。
设计
横断面文献计量分析。
研究对象
经美国研究生医学教育认证委员会（Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education）认证的机构中接受过奖学金培训的青光眼教师。
方法
使用美国国立卫生研究院（NIH）的 iCite 网站对每位青光眼教师进行个体索引。于 2023 年 5 月至 8 月期间收集每位作者的出版物数量、平均 RCR 得分和加权 RCR 得分，并纳入 1980 年至 2023 年发表在 PubMed 上的文章。按性别、职业年限、学术职称和获得哲学博士学位（PhD）对数据进行比较。
主要观察指标
总出版物数量、平均 RCR 值和加权 RCR 值。
结果
索引了来自 113 个机构的 526 名学术青光眼专家。这些医生的研究成果极具影响力，中位数出版物数量为 13 篇（四分位距 [IQR] 4-38），中位数 RCR 为 1.41（IQR 0.97-1.98），中位数加权 RCR 为 16.89（4.80-63.39）。学术职称、职业年限和拥有哲学博士学位与增加出版物数量、平均 RCR 和加权 RCR 有关。出版物数量和加权 RCR 因性别而异；然而，平均 RCR 则没有差异。
结论
目前的学术青光眼专家的平均 RCR 值高于 NIH 的 1 作为研究影响力的基准数据，可用于自我、机构和部门评估。此外，平均 RCR 可能是量化历史上代表性不足的群体研究生产力的准确指标，这些群体因出版物数量等时间依赖性因素而处于不利地位。
金融披露
本文末尾的脚注和披露中可能包含专有或商业披露。
Zotero 插件