Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, H103, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, United States.
Department of Public Health Sciences, A210, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.
Contraception. 2024 Nov;139:110530. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110530. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
To perform cost analyses of foregoing RhD blood type testing and administration of Rh immunoglobulin (RhIg) for bleeding in pregnancy at <12 weeks gestation in the United States.
We created a decision-analytic model comparing the current standard treatment pathway for patients who have threatened, spontaneous, or induced abortion in the United States, with a new pathway foregoing RhD testing and administration of RhIg for those who are RhD-negative at <12 weeks gestation, assuming that the risk of sensitization is 0%. We derived population and cost estimates from the current literature and calculated the number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to screen to avoid one case of fatal hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. We performed sensitivity analyses assuming Rh-sensitization risks of 1.5% and 3% and varying the subsequent pregnancy rates from 44% to 100%.
The annual savings to health care payers in the United States of foregoing RhD testing and RhIg administration with bleeding events at <12 weeks are $5.5 million/100,000 total pregnancies, assuming the sensitization risk is 0%. In sensitivity analyses with a sensitization risk of 1.5% and subsequent pregnancy rate of 84.3% foregoing Rh testing and RhIg administration would save $2.8 million/100,000 pregnancies, with a NNT of 7322 and a number needed to screen of 48,816. At a 3% sensitization rate, the current standard treatment pathway is most economical.
There is an opportunity to save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies by withholding RhIg in specific situations and conserving it for use later in pregnancy.
Cost analyses support foregoing RhD blood type screening and RhIg administration at <12 weeks gestation if the sensitization rate is <3%. By deimplementing this low-value care, payers in the United States can save as much as $5.5 million/100,000 pregnancies and conserve RhIg for use later in pregnancy.
对美国 12 周妊娠前的 RhD 血型检测和 Rh 免疫球蛋白(RhIg)用于妊娠出血的成本进行分析。
我们创建了一个决策分析模型,比较了美国目前对有威胁性、自发性或诱导性流产患者的标准治疗途径,以及对 12 周妊娠前 RhD 阴性患者不进行 RhD 检测和 RhIg 治疗的新途径,假设致敏风险为 0%。我们从当前文献中得出人群和成本估计,并计算了需要治疗的人数(NNT)和需要筛查的人数以避免一例致命的胎儿和新生儿溶血性疾病。我们进行了敏感性分析,假设 Rh 致敏风险为 1.5%和 3%,随后妊娠率从 44%到 100%不等。
在美国,如果将 12 周前出血事件的 RhD 检测和 RhIg 管理省略,每年可为医疗保健支付者节省 550 万美元/10 万例总妊娠,假设致敏风险为 0%。在 Rh 检测和 RhIg 管理省略的敏感性分析中,假设致敏风险为 1.5%,随后妊娠率为 84.3%,则可节省 280 万美元/10 万例妊娠,NNT 为 7322,筛查人数为 48816。在致敏率为 3%的情况下,目前的标准治疗途径最经济。
在特定情况下,可以通过省略 RhIg 来节省高达 550 万美元/10 万例妊娠,并将其保留用于妊娠后期。
成本分析支持在致敏率<3%的情况下省略 12 周妊娠前的 RhD 血型筛查和 RhIg 管理。通过废除这种低价值的护理,美国的支付者可以节省高达 550 万美元/10 万例妊娠,并将 RhIg 保留用于妊娠后期。