Suppr超能文献

高覆盖率预防产前和产后 RhIg 的 RhD 免疫风险因素:一项全国性队列研究。

Risk factors for RhD immunisation in a high coverage prevention programme of antenatal and postnatal RhIg: a nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Centre for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BJOG. 2022 Sep;129(10):1721-1730. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17118. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate which risk factors for RhD immunisation remain, despite adequate routine antenatal and postnatal RhIg prophylaxis (1000 IU RhIg) and additional administration of RhIg. The second objective was assessment of the current prevalence of RhD immunisations.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

The Netherlands.

POPULATION

Two-year nationwide cohort of alloimmunised RhD-negative women.

METHODS

RhD-negative women in their first RhD immunised pregnancy were included for risk factor analysis. We compared risk factors for RhD immunisation, occurring either in the previous non-immunised pregnancy or in the index pregnancy, with national population data derived from the Dutch perinatal registration (Perined).

RESULTS

In the 2-year cohort, data from 193 women were eligible for analysis. Significant risk factors in women previously experiencing a pregnancy of an RhD-positive child (n = 113) were: caesarean section (CS) (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6), perinatal death (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.1-10.9), gestational age >42 weeks (OR 6.1, 95% CI 2.2-16.6), postnatal bleeding (>1000 ml) (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.1-3.6), manual removal of the placenta (MRP) (OR 4.3, 95% CI 2.0-9.3); these factors often occurred in combination. The miscarriage rate was significantly higher than in the Dutch population (35% versus 12.-5%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Complicated deliveries, including cases of major bleeding and surgical interventions (CS, MRP), must be recognised as a risk factor, requiring estimation of fetomaternal haemorrhage volume and adjustment of RhIg dosing. The higher miscarriage rate suggests that existing RhIg protocols need adjustment or better compliance.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Complicated delivery (caesarean section, manual removal placenta, major bleeding) is the most valid risk factor for RhD immunization despite antenatal and postnatal RhIg.

摘要

目的

评估在充分的常规产前和产后 RhIg 预防(1000IU RhIg)以及额外给予 RhIg 的情况下,哪些 RhD 免疫的风险因素仍然存在。第二个目的是评估当前 RhD 免疫的流行率。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

荷兰。

人群

两年内全国 RhD 阴性 alloimmunised 妇女队列。

方法

纳入首次 RhD 免疫妊娠的 RhD 阴性妇女进行危险因素分析。我们比较了在前次未免疫妊娠或指数妊娠中发生的 RhD 免疫的危险因素,并与来自荷兰围产期登记(Perined)的全国人群数据进行了比较。

结果

在 2 年队列中,有 193 名妇女的数据符合分析条件。在之前经历过 RhD 阳性胎儿妊娠的妇女(n=113)中,显著的危险因素是:剖宫产术(CS)(OR 1.7,95%CI 1.1-2.6)、围产期死亡(OR 3.5,95%CI 1.1-10.9)、妊娠年龄>42 周(OR 6.1,95%CI 2.2-16.6)、产后出血(>1000ml)(OR 2.0,95%CI 1.1-3.6)、手动胎盘剥离术(MRP)(OR 4.3,95%CI 2.0-9.3);这些因素经常同时发生。流产率明显高于荷兰人群(35%比 12.-5%,P<0.001)。

结论

复杂的分娩,包括大出血和手术干预(CS、MRP),必须被视为一个危险因素,需要估计胎儿母体出血的量并调整 RhIg 的剂量。较高的流产率表明现有的 RhIg 方案需要调整或更好的依从性。

可推文摘要

尽管有产前和产后 RhIg 预防,但复杂的分娩(剖宫产、手动胎盘剥离术、大出血)仍然是 RhD 免疫的最有效危险因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f411/9543810/c9fbf6813019/BJO-129-1721-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验