• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[从不稳定或临界动脉高血压到轻度高血压。当前数据与实际管理]

[From labile or borderline arterial hypertension to mild hypertension. Current data and practical management].

作者信息

Wicker P, Dallocchio M

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1985 Apr 30;34(4 Pt 2):253-8.

PMID:3890679
Abstract

The concept of labile hypertension (also called borderline hypertension) has been proposed to define those patients in whom blood pressure is sometimes below, sometimes above the frontier which separates normal and high blood pressure. Current evidence does not support the individualization of this concept, since numerous studies have demonstrated a similar or even higher blood pressure variability in hypertensive patients than that found in normotensive patients. The main objective, when measuring blood pressure, is to assess the risk of a cardiovascular event. It has been shown that the average value of several blood pressure determinations provides a better estimate of cardiovascular risk, and correlates better with hypertensive target organ disease, than a single blood pressure measurement. Therefore, we propose to define these so-called labile hypertensive patients on the basis of the average and to classify them into the category of mild hypertension, the later being defined as a diastolic blood pressure between 90 and 105 mmHg on several occasions according to the WHO. The increase in cardiovascular risk carried by a mild elevation in blood pressure, either untreated or treated with general health measures, is small, approximately 3% per year. Moreover, whereas the beneficial effects of pharmacological antihypertensive therapy have been demonstrated on a whole population basis, these effects remain controversial on an individual basis. Thus, it appears justified to give these hypertensive patients general health measures advice without any pharmacological therapy during the first months of follow-up. During this time, blood pressure measurements are repeated so that blood pressure status, and thus the need for pharmacological therapy, can be assessed more precisely.

摘要

不稳定高血压(也称为临界高血压)这一概念已被提出,用于定义那些血压有时低于、有时高于区分正常血压和高血压界限的患者。目前的证据并不支持这一概念的个体化,因为大量研究表明,高血压患者的血压变异性与血压正常者相似,甚至更高。测量血压的主要目的是评估心血管事件的风险。研究表明,多次血压测定的平均值比单次血压测量能更好地估计心血管风险,并且与高血压靶器官疾病的相关性更强。因此,我们建议根据平均值来定义这些所谓的不稳定高血压患者,并将他们归类为轻度高血压,根据世界卫生组织的标准,轻度高血压定义为多次测量时舒张压在90至105 mmHg之间。血压轻度升高,无论未经治疗还是采用一般健康措施治疗,所带来的心血管风险增加都很小,每年约为3%。此外,虽然药理学降压治疗对整个人群的有益效果已得到证实,但在个体层面上这些效果仍存在争议。因此,在随访的最初几个月,对这些高血压患者给予一般健康措施建议而不进行任何药物治疗似乎是合理的。在此期间,重复测量血压,以便更精确地评估血压状况,从而确定是否需要药物治疗。

相似文献

1
[From labile or borderline arterial hypertension to mild hypertension. Current data and practical management].[从不稳定或临界动脉高血压到轻度高血压。当前数据与实际管理]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1985 Apr 30;34(4 Pt 2):253-8.
2
ESH-ESC guidelines for the management of hypertension.欧洲高血压学会(ESH)和欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)高血压管理指南
Herz. 2006 Jun;31(4):331-8. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2829-3.
3
The 2004 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part I--Blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk.2004年加拿大高血压教育计划关于高血压管理的建议:第一部分——血压测量、诊断及风险评估
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Jan;20(1):31-40.
4
Lack of control of high blood pressure and treatment recommendations in Canada.加拿大高血压控制不力及治疗建议
Can J Cardiol. 2002 Jun;18(6):657-61.
5
[Systolic-diastolic arterial hypertension versus isolated systolic hypertension].收缩期-舒张期动脉高血压与单纯收缩期高血压
Ital Heart J. 2000 Jun;1 Suppl 2:93-9.
6
[Arterial hypertension of the aged patient in general medicine. French national survey].[老年患者的动脉高血压在普通医学中的情况。法国全国性调查]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1999 Aug;92(8):1089-94.
7
New treatment guidelines for a patient with diabetes and hypertension.糖尿病和高血压患者的新治疗指南。
J Hypertens Suppl. 2003 Mar;21(1):S25-30.
8
[Arterial hypertension difficult to control in the elderly patient. The significance of the "white coat effect"].老年患者中难以控制的动脉高血压。“白大衣效应”的意义
Rev Port Cardiol. 1999 Oct;18(10):897-906.
9
[Management of essential arterial hypertension and cardiovascular risk levels. Observation in general medicine: national PHENOMEN study. Evaluation and stratification of cardiovascular risk based on the 2000 ANAES recommendations in a population of hypertensive patients].[原发性动脉高血压与心血管风险水平的管理。全科医学观察:全国PHENOMEN研究。基于2000年ANAES建议对高血压患者群体进行心血管风险评估与分层]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 2002 Jul-Aug;95(7-8):667-72.
10
[Prevalence, treatment and control of hypertension in family practice patients in France during 1994].[1994年法国家庭医疗患者中高血压的患病率、治疗与控制情况]
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1996 Aug;89(8):1075-80.