Sierra-Murguía Mariana A, Mazatán-Orozco Regina, Jiménez-Pacheco Said Enrique, Padrós-Blázquez Ferrán
Cancer Center Tec100, México.
Tecnologico de Monterrey, México.
J Health Psychol. 2025 Mar;30(3):400-409. doi: 10.1177/13591053241257317. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
Thought style has been described as a mediator between cancer diagnosis and the emotional response to cancer. Describe the latent profiles related to thought style (rumination, cognitive engagement, and cognitive avoidance) and emotional response in a sample of cancer patients. 159 cancer patients were assessed prior to starting treatment. Measurement instruments used were HADS, Cancer response thought style inventory, distress thermometer, and PTGI. Analysis of latent classes to explore profiles of who share the same thought style. The solution had 4 subgroups: first group was avoidance, the means for anxiety, depression and post-traumatic growth were the lowest of the four groups. The second group was rumination, presenting highest scores for anxiety, depression and post-traumatic growth. The third group was indeterminate, this group presented low anxiety and depression. The fourth group, with cognitive engagement presented low anxiety and depression and post-traumatic growth was high.
思维方式被描述为癌症诊断与对癌症的情绪反应之间的一种中介因素。描述癌症患者样本中与思维方式(沉思、认知参与和认知回避)及情绪反应相关的潜在类别。159名癌症患者在开始治疗前接受了评估。使用的测量工具包括医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、癌症反应思维方式量表、痛苦温度计和创伤后成长量表(PTGI)。通过潜在类别分析来探索具有相同思维方式的人群特征。结果有4个亚组:第一组是回避型,其焦虑、抑郁和创伤后成长的均值在四组中最低。第二组是沉思型,焦虑、抑郁和创伤后成长得分最高。第三组是不确定型,该组焦虑和抑郁程度较低。第四组是认知参与型,焦虑和抑郁程度较低且创伤后成长程度较高。