• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手握力不对称和握力弱与认知功能的关系:一项全国代表性队列研究。

Association of handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness with cognitive function: a nationally representative cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China; Inflammation and Immune Mediated Diseases Laboratory of Anhui Province, Hefei 230032, Anhui, China.

出版信息

Maturitas. 2024 Sep;187:108057. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108057. Epub 2024 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108057
PMID:38908060
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the association of handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness with cognitive function among Chinese middle-aged and older adults.

STUDY DESIGN

We used data from four waves (2011, 2013, 2015, and 2018) of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Handgrip strength was measured at baseline. Handgrip strength asymmetry was defined on the basis of the ratio of handgrip strength of the non-dominant hand to that of the dominant hand (i.e. non-dominant/dominant): a ratio of <0.9 defined as dominant handgrip strength asymmetry and >1.1 as non-dominant handgrip strength asymmetry. Weakness was defined as a handgrip strength of <28 kg for males or <18 kg for females.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cognitive function with its two core dimensions (episodic memory and mental status) at each wave was assessed and standardized.

RESULTS

9333 participants (48.3 % female, age 58.2 ± 9.0 years) were included. Non-dominant but not dominant handgrip strength asymmetry was significantly associated with poorer cognitive function at baseline (β = -0.121, -0.092, and -0.132 for mental status, episodic memory, and global cognition, respectively). In longitudinal analyses over 2 years, dominant handgrip strength asymmetry significantly slowed cognitive decline (β = -0.078 and -0.069 for mental status and global cognition, respectively), and non-dominant handgrip strength asymmetry accelerated cognitive decline (β = 0.053 and 0.043 for episodic memory and global cognition, respectively). Weakness was associated with poorer cognitive function at baseline and cognitive decline over 2, 4, and 7 years (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In middle-aged and older adults, non-dominant handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness were associated with poorer cognitive function and predicted accelerated cognitive decline. Dominant handgrip strength asymmetry may be beneficial for maintaining cognitive function.

摘要

目的

描述中国中老年人群握力不对称和握力弱与认知功能的关系。

研究设计

我们使用了中国健康与退休纵向研究(China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study)的四个时间点(2011 年、2013 年、2015 年和 2018 年)的数据。在基线时测量握力。握力不对称定义为非优势手与优势手的握力之比(即非优势手/优势手):<0.9 定义为优势手握力不对称,>1.1 定义为非优势手握力不对称。握力弱定义为男性<28kg 或女性<18kg。

主要观察指标

在每个时间点评估和标准化认知功能及其两个核心维度(情景记忆和精神状态)。

结果

共纳入 9333 名参与者(48.3%为女性,年龄 58.2±9.0 岁)。非优势手但非优势手握力不对称与基线时认知功能较差显著相关(精神状态、情景记忆和总体认知的β值分别为-0.121、-0.092 和-0.132)。在 2 年的纵向分析中,优势手握力不对称显著减缓认知衰退(精神状态和总体认知的β值分别为-0.078 和-0.069),而非优势手握力不对称加速认知衰退(情景记忆和总体认知的β值分别为 0.053 和 0.043)。握力弱与基线时认知功能差和 2、4、7 年的认知衰退相关(均 P<0.05)。

结论

在中老年人群中,非优势手握力不对称和握力弱与认知功能较差相关,并预测认知衰退加速。优势手握力不对称可能对维持认知功能有益。

相似文献

1
Association of handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness with cognitive function: a nationally representative cohort study.手握力不对称和握力弱与认知功能的关系:一项全国代表性队列研究。
Maturitas. 2024 Sep;187:108057. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.108057. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
2
Associations of Handgrip Strength Weakness and Asymmetry with Lower Cognitive Function: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2014).握力减弱和不对称与较低认知功能的关联:来自国家健康和营养调查的结果(2011-2014 年)。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2024;99(1):393-402. doi: 10.3233/JAD-231375.
3
Association of Handgrip Strength Weakness and Asymmetry With Incidence of Motoric Cognitive Risk Syndrome in the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.握力减弱和不对称与运动认知风险综合征发病的关联:中国健康与养老追踪调查。
Neurology. 2023 Jun 6;100(23):e2342-e2349. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207308. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
4
Handgrip strength asymmetry and cognitive impairment risk: Insights from a seven-year prospective cohort study.握力不对称与认知障碍风险:一项为期七年的前瞻性队列研究的启示。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2024 Jan;28(1):100004. doi: 10.1016/j.jnha.2023.100004. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
5
Association of handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness with depression among middle-aged and older population in China: A cohort study.中国中老年人群中握力不对称与握力减弱与抑郁的关联:一项队列研究
J Affect Disord. 2024 Oct 15;363:401-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.07.120. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
6
The relationship between low handgrip strength with or without asymmetry and fall risk among middle-aged and older males in China: evidence from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study.中国中老年男性低握力(无论是否存在不对称性)与跌倒风险的关系:来自中国健康与养老追踪调查的证据。
Postgrad Med J. 2023 Nov 20;99(1178):1246-1252. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgad085.
7
Handgrip Strength Asymmetry and Weakness Are Associated with Lower Cognitive Function: A Panel Study.握力不对称和握力减弱与较低的认知功能有关:一项面板研究。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Sep;68(9):2051-2058. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16556. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
Handgrip Strength Asymmetry and Weakness are Differentially Associated with Functional Limitations in Older Americans.握力不对称和握力减弱与美国老年人的功能障碍存在差异相关性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 6;17(9):3231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093231.
9
Association of handgrip strength asymmetry and weakness with functional disability among middle-aged and older adults in China.中国中老年人群握力不对称和握力弱与功能障碍的关联。
J Glob Health. 2024 Mar 29;14:04047. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04047.
10
Temporal relationship between handgrip strength and cognitive performance in oldest old people.老年人握力与认知表现之间的时间关系。
Age Ageing. 2012 Jul;41(4):506-12. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs013. Epub 2012 Feb 27.